Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Isolating and Incorporating Light-Harvesting Antennas from Diatom Cyclotella Meneghiniana in Liposomes with Thylakoid Lipids
Published on: August 28, 2018
Revisiting the taxonomy of the "Dinophysis acuminata complex'' (Dinophyta)'
Jeong Ha Park1, Miran Kim2, Hae Jin Jeong3
1LOHABE, Department of Oceanography, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Marine dinoflagellates of the genus Dinophysis are well known for producing diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) toxins and/or pectenotoxins which have a significant impact on public health as well as on marine aquaculture. Out of more than 80 Dinophysis species recorded so far, D. cf. acuminata is the most commonly observed in coastal areas worldwide. Due to their highly similar morphological features, however, an accurate discrimination of the various D. cf. acuminata species such as D. acuminata, D. ovum, and D. sacculus under light microscopy has proven to be a difficult task to accomplish. Hence, these species have thus far been referred to as the "Dinophysis acuminata complex". Recent studies showed a discrimination between local strains of D. acuminata and D. ovum from Galician, northwestern Spain, using the mitochondrial cox1 gene as a genetic marker in addition to commonly used morphological features such as size and contour of the large hypothecal plates, shape of the small cells formed as part of their polymorphic life-cycle, development of the left sulcal list and ribs, and length of the right sulcal list. In the present study, attempts were made to discriminate between D. acuminata and D. ovum following single-cell isolation of 54 "D. acuminata complex" collected from Korean coastal waters, based on the abovementioned traits. Morphological data showed that all the traits analyzed overlapped between the two species. The mitochondrial cox1 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I) gene sequences of every isolate were also determined, but a genetic distinction between D. acuminata and D. ovum could not be confirmed, suggesting that the cox1 gene is not a suitable genetic marker for discrimination between the two species. The results of this study suggest that the morphological variations observed within the "D. acuminata complex" may have been caused by several factors (e.g. different geographical locations, seasonal changes, and different environmental conditions), and that D. acuminata and D. ovum may be the same species.
Related Concept Videos
Diversity of Protists III
Other Algae
Bacterial Phylum Cyanobacteria
Diversity of Protists II
Taxonomy
Hierarchy of Taxonomy
The hierarchy that Carolus Linnaeus first...
Phylogeny

