Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Real-world effectiveness and safety of blinatumomab in adults with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia across 13 European countries.

Blood cancer journal·2026
Same author

To the Maximal Nuclear Diameter and Cell Cycle Phase of Lymphoblasts or Myeloblasts in Patients Suffering from Acute Lymphoblastic and Myeloblastic Leukaemia. A Simple Morphological and Technical Note.

Folia biologica·2026
Same author

Interferon signature predicts chemotherapy resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie·2025
Same author

Somatic mutations and outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia adolescent and young adults compared to children, adults, and BCR::ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Leukemia·2025
Same author

NGS-MRD negativity in post-HSCT ALL spares unnecessary therapeutic interventions triggered by borderline qPCR results without an increase in relapse risk.

HemaSphere·2025
Same author

Blinatumomab in induction therapy improves molecular response in untreated adults with Ph- B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Haematologica·2025
Same journal

MKRN1 suppresses cuproptosis in colorectal cancer through ubiquitin-dependent regulation of SLC31A1.

Biological procedures online·2026
Same journal

Ethacrynic Oxadiazole 6u Induces Apoptosis by Targeting mTOR/c-Flip Axis and Noxa in Lymphoma Cells.

Biological procedures online·2026
Same journal

Development and Comparison of Two Rabbit Tibiofemoral Joint Replacement Models.

Biological procedures online·2026
Same journal

A novel prognostic model based on MVIRGs identifies ANGPT2 as a key target driving the malignant progression of HCC.

Biological procedures online·2026
Same journal

Lipid Metabolic Rewiring During Continuous Prostate Cancer Progression Defines a Biologically Relevant Four-Gene Prognostic Signature.

Biological procedures online·2026
Same journal

Targeting Hyaluronan Signaling Overcomes Primary Effusion Lymphoma Cells Resistance to Rapamycin.

Biological procedures online·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 6, 2026

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

106.2K

DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison.

Šárka Šestáková1,2, Cyril Šálek1,2, Hana Remešová2

  • 11Institute of Clinical and Experimental Hematology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Prague, Czech Republic.

Biological Procedures Online
|October 5, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares four DNA methylation assessment methods: MSRE, pyrosequencing, MS-HRM, and qMSP. Pyrosequencing and MS-HRM are most convenient, offering accuracy and efficiency for clinical diagnostics.

Keywords:
DNA methylationMS-HRMMSREPyrosequencingValidation methodsqMSP

More Related Videos

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

37.9K
Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation
12:11

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Published on: May 20, 2018

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 6, 2026

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

106.2K
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

37.9K
Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation
12:11

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Published on: May 20, 2018

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Epigenetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • DNA methylation is a critical epigenetic modification influencing gene expression.
  • Accurate assessment of DNA methylation is essential for understanding various biological processes and diseases.
  • Several methods exist for DNA methylation analysis, each with unique advantages and limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a practical comparison of four common DNA methylation validation methods.
  • To evaluate methods based on primer design, feasibility, accuracy, cost, and clinical diagnostic utility.
  • To assess DNA methylation levels at three distinct loci using the selected methods.

Main Methods:

  • Methylation-specific restriction endonucleases (MSRE) analysis
  • Pyrosequencing
  • Methylation-specific high-resolution DNA melting (MS-HRM)
  • Quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP)

Main Results:

  • Pyrosequencing and MS-HRM were identified as the most convenient and accurate methods.
  • Pyrosequencing allows CpG-specific analysis but has a high instrument cost.
  • MS-HRM is a rapid, cost-effective, and accurate PCR-based method.
  • MSRE analysis is simple but expensive and unsuitable for intermediate methylation.
  • qMSP demonstrated the lowest accuracy with demanding primer design and optimization.

Conclusions:

  • Pyrosequencing and MS-HRM are recommended for DNA methylation assessment due to their convenience and accuracy.
  • Method selection should consider specific research or diagnostic needs, including cost, accuracy, and throughput.
  • Further optimization of qMSP and MSRE analysis may enhance their utility in specific applications.