Synapomorphies Behind Shared Derived Characters: Examples from the Great Apes' Genomic Data

Phylogenetic systematics (e.g., cladistics) is one of the most important analytical frameworks of modern Biology. It seems to be common knowledge that within phylogenetics, 'groups' must be defined based solely on the synapomorphies or on the "derived" characters that unite two or more taxa in a clade or monophyletic group. Thus, the idea of synapomorphy seems to be of fundamental influence and importance. Here I will show that the most common and straightforward understanding of synapomorphy as a shared derived character is not sufficient and eventually must be rejected in favor of Nelson's relational interpretation of such term. Arguing for this point and using three examples from previously published Apes' genomic matrices, I explicitly demonstrate that the relationship (Pongo (Gorilla (Homo, Pan))) with Hylobatidae as a sister taxon, may be successfully recovered by three-taxon statement analysis (3TA) and three-taxon statement average consensus analysis (3TS-ACA) even if all of the evident standard shared derived molecular characters of the relationship (Pongo (Gorilla (Homo, Pan))) with Hylobatidae as a sister taxon, have been excluded from the molecular alignments. Neither conventional Maximum Parsimony nor Maximum Likelihood or Bayesian Inference can do this in such situation. Thus, our results show that the relationship (Pongo (Gorilla (Homo, Pan))) with Hylobatidae as a sister taxon has appeared, in some way, behind standard shared derived characters: the last ones could be excluded, but the relationship remains the same.