Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

268
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
268
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

353
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
353
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

333
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
333
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

2.6K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
2.6K
The Influence of Cognition on Affect01:29

The Influence of Cognition on Affect

168
Cognition plays a pivotal role in shaping emotional experiences, as demonstrated by Schachter and Singer’s two-factor theory of emotion. According to this model, emotion arises from a combination of physiological arousal and cognitive interpretation. The body’s physiological response to stimuli is ambiguous and only gains emotional significance through cognitive labeling. For instance, an increased heart rate and adrenaline surge while standing near an attractive person may be...
168

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Deep learning-based classification of earthquake-damaged buildings using terrestrial images.

Disasters·2026
Same journal

Social capital and grassroots organisational change: a comparative case study from post-Morakot Taiwan.

Disasters·2026
Same journal

Post-disaster deterritorialisation and 'roof-centred' recovery: enduring policy impacts on marginalised groups in Brazil.

Disasters·2026
Same journal

RETRACTION: The Significance of Local Government in Disaster Management for International Migrants: The Case of Minoh City, Osaka Prefecture.

Disasters·2026
Same journal

On unstable ground: gendered vulnerabilities and community perceptions of landslides in rural Uganda.

Disasters·2026
Same journal

Gender and social capital in disaster resilience: a qualitative study of rural women leaders in partnership with international humanitarian organisations.

Disasters·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.4K

How structural mitigation shapes risk perception and affects decision-making.

Marvin Starominski-Uehara1

  • 1Risk Management Consultant, Japan.

Disasters
|October 7, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Australian residents trust structural flood defenses but question their management. Despite acknowledging the necessity of engineering solutions, they attribute flood losses to operational decisions, not a lack of faith in the structures themselves.

Keywords:
decision makingrisk perceptionstructural mitigation

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.4K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.4K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.4K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.6K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Risk Management
  • Social Science

Background:

  • Understanding public perception of flood risk and structural mitigation is crucial for effective disaster management.
  • The 'levee paradox,' where residents become complacent due to perceived safety from structural measures, is a key concern in flood-prone areas.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the relationship between risk perception and structural flood mitigation measures in an Australian context.
  • To investigate public opinion on authorities' flood risk mitigation capabilities.
  • To assess the influence of flood experience on risk perception and protective action decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of study participants' opinions on flood risk perception.
  • Review of Australian flood management policies and public engagement.
  • Case study analysis of flood events and resident attributions of loss.

Main Results:

  • Participants generally do not exhibit the 'levee paradox,' taking precautionary measures against residual flood risk.
  • A majority of respondents support the necessity of engineering structures for flood risk mitigation.
  • Flood losses were primarily attributed by residents to operational decisions regarding dam water releases, indicating a nuanced view of structural measure management.

Conclusions:

  • Public trust in the necessity of structural flood mitigation exists, but concerns remain regarding their operational management.
  • Effective flood risk communication should address both the engineering of structures and their day-to-day management.
  • Future flood management strategies must consider public perception of operational decisions to enhance community resilience.