Unilateral is comparable to bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion in acute type A aortic dissection repair

Elizabeth L Norton1, Xiaoting Wu2, Karen M Kim2

  • 1Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Neb.

Insights

Unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (uni-ACP) and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (bi-ACP) show similar brain protection in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair. Uni-ACP is recommended for its simplicity and reduced complication risk.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Aortic Disease

Background:

  • Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening condition requiring complex surgical repair.
  • Cerebral perfusion strategies, including unilateral (uni-ACP) and bilateral (bi-ACP) antegrade cerebral perfusion, are critical for protecting brain function during ATAAD surgery.
  • Optimal perfusion strategy remains a subject of ongoing research and clinical debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of uni-ACP versus bi-ACP in patients undergoing surgical repair for ATAAD.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of both perfusion techniques in preventing neurological complications and improving survival rates.
  • To determine if uni-ACP offers advantages in terms of simplicity or reduced perioperative complications.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 307 patients who underwent surgical repair of ATAAD between 2001 and 2017.
  • Patients were divided into two groups based on the perfusion strategy used: uni-ACP (n=140) and bi-ACP (n=167).
  • Data were collected from a cardiac surgery data warehouse, medical records, and the National Death Index, analyzing perioperative outcomes, stroke rates, and long-term survival.

Main Results:

  • Demographics and comorbidities were similar between uni-ACP and bi-ACP groups.
  • Perioperative outcomes, including 30-day mortality and overall stroke rates, were not significantly different between the groups.
  • Reoperation for bleeding was significantly lower in the uni-ACP group (5% vs. 12%, P=.03), and mid-term survival was better in the uni-ACP group (5-year survival: 84% vs. 76%, P=.027).

Conclusions:

  • Both uni-ACP and bi-ACP are effective in brain protection during ATAAD repair, with comparable low rates of postoperative stroke and mortality.
  • Uni-ACP is associated with a lower rate of reoperation for bleeding and better mid-term survival.
  • Uni-ACP is recommended due to its simplicity and reduced manipulation of arch branch vessels, making it a favorable option for hemiarch to zone 3 arch replacement in ATAAD.
Abstract