Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Unilateral is comparable to bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion in acute type A aortic dissection repair
Elizabeth L Norton1, Xiaoting Wu2, Karen M Kim2
1Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Neb.
Insights
Unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (uni-ACP) and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (bi-ACP) show similar brain protection in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair. Uni-ACP is recommended for its simplicity and reduced complication risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Aortic Disease
Background:
- Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening condition requiring complex surgical repair.
- Cerebral perfusion strategies, including unilateral (uni-ACP) and bilateral (bi-ACP) antegrade cerebral perfusion, are critical for protecting brain function during ATAAD surgery.
- Optimal perfusion strategy remains a subject of ongoing research and clinical debate.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of uni-ACP versus bi-ACP in patients undergoing surgical repair for ATAAD.
- To evaluate the efficacy of both perfusion techniques in preventing neurological complications and improving survival rates.
- To determine if uni-ACP offers advantages in terms of simplicity or reduced perioperative complications.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 307 patients who underwent surgical repair of ATAAD between 2001 and 2017.
- Patients were divided into two groups based on the perfusion strategy used: uni-ACP (n=140) and bi-ACP (n=167).
- Data were collected from a cardiac surgery data warehouse, medical records, and the National Death Index, analyzing perioperative outcomes, stroke rates, and long-term survival.
Main Results:
- Demographics and comorbidities were similar between uni-ACP and bi-ACP groups.
- Perioperative outcomes, including 30-day mortality and overall stroke rates, were not significantly different between the groups.
- Reoperation for bleeding was significantly lower in the uni-ACP group (5% vs. 12%, P=.03), and mid-term survival was better in the uni-ACP group (5-year survival: 84% vs. 76%, P=.027).
Conclusions:
- Both uni-ACP and bi-ACP are effective in brain protection during ATAAD repair, with comparable low rates of postoperative stroke and mortality.
- Uni-ACP is associated with a lower rate of reoperation for bleeding and better mid-term survival.
- Uni-ACP is recommended due to its simplicity and reduced manipulation of arch branch vessels, making it a favorable option for hemiarch to zone 3 arch replacement in ATAAD.
Objective:
To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of unilateral and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (uni-ACP and bi-ACP) in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair.
Methods:
From 2001 to 2017, 307 patients underwent surgical repair of an ATAAD using uni-ACP (n = 140) and bi-ACP (n = 167). Data were collected through the Department of Cardiac Surgery Data Warehouse, medical record review, and the National Death Index database.
Results:
The demographics and preoperative comorbidities were similar between the uni-ACP and bi-ACP groups. Both groups had similar rates of procedures for aortic valve/root, ascending aorta, frozen elephant trunk, and other concomitant procedures. Perioperative outcomes were not significantly different between the 2 groups (30-day mortality: uni-ACP 3.4% vs bi-ACP 7.8%, P = .12) except reoperation for bleeding was significantly lower in uni-ACP (5% vs 12%, P = .03). Between the uni-ACP and bi-ACP groups, overall postoperative stroke rate (6% vs 9%, P = .4) and left brain stroke rate (0.7% vs 3.0%, P = .23) were not significantly different. The odds ratio of uni-ACP versus bi-ACP was 0.87 (P = .80) for postoperative stroke and 0.86 (P = .81) for operative mortality. The mid-term survival was better in the uni-ACP group, P = .027 (5-year: 84% vs 76%). The hazard ratio of all-time mortality for uni-ACP versus bi-ACP was 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-1.65), P = .46.
Conclusions:
In ATAAD, both uni-ACP and bi-ACP are equally effective to protect the brain with low postoperative stroke rates and mortality in hemiarch to zone 3 arch replacement. Uni-ACP is recommended for its simplicity and less manipulation of arch branch vessels.

