Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanical Protein Functions01:58

Mechanical Protein Functions

5.5K
Proteins perform many mechanical functions in a cell. These proteins can be classified into two general categories- proteins that generate mechanical forces and proteins that are subjected to mechanical forces. Proteins providing mechanical support to the structure of the cell, such as keratin, are subjected to mechanical force, whereas proteins involved in cell movement and transport of molecules across cell membranes, such as an ion pump, are examples of generating mechanical force. 
5.5K
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

9.0K
Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
9.0K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.0K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.0K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

14.4K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
14.4K
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

13.9K
Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain.  Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
13.9K
Force and Potential Energy in One Dimension01:13

Force and Potential Energy in One Dimension

6.2K
Force can be calculated from the expression for potential energy, which is a function of position. The component of a conservative force, in a particular direction, equals the negative of the derivative of the corresponding potential energy with respect to the displacement in that direction. For regions where potential energy changes rapidly with displacement, the work done and force is maximum. Also, when force is applied along the positive coordinate axis, the potential energy decreases with...
6.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Repurposing Thiamine-Dependent Benzaldehyde Lyases as Visible-Light-Driven Radical Acyltransferases.

Accounts of chemical research·2026
Same author

Engineering a Thiamine-Dependent Benzoylformate Decarboxylase for Stereodivergent Radical C(sp<sup>3</sup>)-C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Bond Formation.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Mechanism investigation of <i>Actinidia arguta</i> total flavone on gout via network pharmacology and <i>vivo</i> experiments pharmacological verification.

Open life sciences·2026
Same author

Integrating microbial cell factory with new-to-nature photobiocatalysis for de novo biosynthesis of D-homotryptophan.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Protective effect of rapeseed pollen extract on alcoholic liver injury in mice.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Electroenzymatic Oxidative Desymmetrization by Engineered Thiamine-Dependent Enzymes for the Enantioselective Synthesis of Axially Chiral Biaryls.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K

EvoEF2: accurate and fast energy function for computational protein design.

Xiaoqiang Huang1, Robin Pearce1, Yang Zhang1,2

  • 1Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, MI 48109, USA.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|October 8, 2019
PubMed
Summary

We developed EvoEF2, an improved energy function for de novo protein design. This computational tool enhances accuracy in designing novel protein sequences and structures, outperforming previous methods.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

884
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

884
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Protein Engineering
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Current de novo protein design methods face limitations in accuracy and success rates.
  • Parameter over-fitting in existing energy functions hinders discrimination between correct and incorrect protein designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an enhanced energy function, EvoEF2, for efficient de novo protein sequence design.
  • To improve the accuracy and success rate of computational protein design.

Main Methods:

  • Developed EvoEF2, an extended physical energy function building upon EvoEF.
  • Optimized EvoEF2 parameters using sequence recapitulation.
  • Evaluated EvoEF2 performance on monomer and dimer datasets for native sequence recovery.
  • Assessed the foldability of designed sequences using I-TASSER.

Main Results:

  • EvoEF2 achieved significant improvements in native sequence recapitulation for both monomers and dimers compared to EvoEF.
  • Designed monomer sequences were predicted to fold into structures highly similar to native counterparts (87.8% with RMSD < 2 Å).
  • Parameter optimization using sequence recapitulation proved more effective for computational protein design than using thermodynamic mutation data.

Conclusions:

  • EvoEF2 offers a more accurate and efficient approach for de novo protein sequence design.
  • The study highlights the critical role of parameter optimization in the effectiveness of physical energy functions for protein design.
  • EvoEF2 demonstrates superior performance and applicability in designing novel protein sequences and interactions.