Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

852
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
852
Survival Curves01:18

Survival Curves

609
Survival curves are graphical representations that depict the survival experience of a population over time, offering an intuitive way to track the proportion of individuals who remain event-free at each time point. These curves are widely used in fields such as medicine, public health, and reliability engineering to visualize and compare survival probabilities across different groups or conditions.
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
609
Interpreting Run Charts01:25

Interpreting Run Charts

3.0K
Run charts, essentially line graphs plotted over time, serve as fundamental yet effective tools for process analysis. They chronicle data sequentially, facilitating the identification of trends, shifts, or cyclical movements. This graphical representation is instrumental in determining whether a process is stable or exhibits signs of potential instability indicative of special cause variation. In the healthcare domain, run charts depict infection rates over time, enabling hospitals to monitor...
3.0K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of the 4Kscore in EPIC: Letter.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Patient Engagement With an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool Evaluating Hospital Discharge Readiness After Cancer Surgery.

JCO oncology practice·2026
Same author

Missing infrastructure for real-world predictive AI impact.

BMJ health & care informatics·2026
Same author

Using routinely collected data for research purposes: challenges and mitigation strategies.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Critical appraisal of fairness metrics for artificial intelligence-based clinical prediction models: a scoping review.

The Lancet. Digital health·2026
Same author

Diagnostic and prognostic utility of PSMA-PET/CT in node-metastatic prostate cancer.

BJU international·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.9K

A simple, step-by-step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis.

Andrew J Vickers1, Ben van Calster2,3, Ewout W Steyerberg3

  • 11Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10017 USA.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
|October 9, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decision curve analysis (DCA) interpretation is clarified by relabeling axes to "benefit" and "preference." This approach helps recommend prediction models and diagnostic tests based on clinical utility.

Keywords:
Decision curve analysisEducational paperNet benefit

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method
09:16

Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method

Published on: May 12, 2023

1.5K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

16.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.9K
Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method
09:16

Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method

Published on: May 12, 2023

1.5K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

16.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Decision curve analysis (DCA) is a method for evaluating prediction models and diagnostic tests, first introduced in 2006.
  • Despite its common use, widespread misunderstanding of DCA persists in scientific literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a clear, step-by-step guide for interpreting decision curve analysis.
  • To address common questions and confusions surrounding the application and understanding of DCA.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes relabeling the y-axis of decision curves to "benefit" and the x-axis to "preference."
  • This re-labeling aims to simplify the interpretation of the net benefit of a model or test across various threshold probabilities.

Main Results:

  • Relabeling the axes as "benefit" and "preference" can resolve many interpretation difficulties.
  • A prediction model or diagnostic test is recommended for clinical use if it demonstrates the highest benefit over a range of clinically relevant preferences.

Conclusions:

  • Decision curve analysis is readily interpretable with adherence to simple guidelines.
  • Clearer interpretation of DCA promotes more accurate evaluation and application of prediction models and diagnostic tests in clinical practice.