An Exploration of Myths, Barriers, and Strategies for Improving Diversity Among STS Members
Leah M Backhus1, Jacques Kpodonu2, Jennifer C Romano3
1Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Abstract:
Diversity within health care organizations has many proven benefits, yet women and other groups remain underrepresented in cardiothoracic surgery. We sought to explore responses from a Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) survey to identify myths and barriers for informing organizational strategies in the STS and cardiothoracic surgery. We performed a qualitative review of narrative survey responses within three domains surrounding diversity in cardiothoracic surgery: myths, barriers, and strategies for improvement. Common diversity myths included diversity as a pipeline problem (24%), diversity equated to exclusivity (21%), and diversity not supporting meritocracy (18%). The most frequent barrier code was perceived prejudice (22%). Suggested strategies toward improvement were culture change prioritizing diversity (22%) and training the leaders (14%). Notably, 15% of response codes reflected the belief that disparities do not exist; thus, the issue should not be prioritized by the organization. The results do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of most of the STS membership; nonetheless, they provide important insight critical to guide any efforts toward eliminating disparities within cardiothoracic surgery and improving the care of our patients.
More Related Videos
04:37Author Spotlight: Increasing TMS Accessibility Through Braiding Techniques for Diverse Hair Types
Published on: August 9, 2024
11:13The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Robbers Cave
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Motivational Bias
Impact of Individuals on a Group
Halo Effect
