Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
The conduct and reporting of mediation analysis in recently published randomized controlled trials: results from a
Tat-Thang Vo1, Cecilia Superchi2, Isabelle Boutron3
1Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S9, 9000, Ghent, Belgium; Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, F-75004, Paris, France.
Objectives:
To describe the methodological characteristics of mediation analyses (MAs) reported in recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to propose recommendations on the planning, conduct, and reporting of MAs in practice.
Study Design And Setting:
We conducted a systematic review by searching MEDLINE (January 1, 2017, to December 1, 2018) for all reports of RCTs or secondary analyses of previously published RCTs that reported a MA. Two reviewers independently screened the title, abstracts, and full texts of the identified reports and extracted the data from the 98 eligible studies.
Results:
MAs were nearly always (96%) based on a traditional mediation approach. Most studies did not report a sample size calculation for the MA (96%) or assess potential treatment-by-mediator interactions (96%). In 53% of studies, mediators and outcomes were simultaneously measured. In 57% of studies, mediator-mediator and mediator-outcome confounders were adjusted for in the analysis, although adjustment was often limited to few potential confounders. About 30% of studies discussed the assumptions underlying the MA.
Conclusion:
The conduct and reporting of MAs remained quite heterogeneous in practice. Future MAs could benefit from a consensus-based planning, conduct, and reporting guideline for MA.
Insights
Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often use traditional mediation analyses (MAs) but lack methodological rigor. Improved guidelines are needed for planning, conducting, and reporting MAs in research.
Area of Science:
- Methodology in Clinical Trials
- Statistical Analysis in Health Research
Background:
- Mediation analyses (MAs) are increasingly used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to understand intervention effects.
- Methodological consistency and reporting quality in MAs require evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the methodological characteristics of MAs in recent RCTs.
- To provide recommendations for improving the planning, conduct, and reporting of MAs.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of RCTs and secondary analyses reporting MAs.
- Searched MEDLINE from January 2017 to December 2018.
- Data extracted from 98 eligible studies by two independent reviewers.
Main Results:
- Nearly all MAs (96%) used traditional approaches.
- Most studies lacked sample size calculations (96%) and assessment of treatment-by-mediator interactions (96%).
- Simultaneous measurement of mediators and outcomes occurred in 53% of studies; confounder adjustment was inconsistent.
Conclusions:
- Mediation analyses in RCTs show considerable heterogeneity in conduct and reporting.
- A consensus-based guideline is recommended to enhance the quality of future MAs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Regression Toward the Mean
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

