Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Studying Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cell Characteristics for Developing New Treatment Strategies
Published on: June 20, 2015
Reports of Lactic Acidosis Attributed to Metformin, 2015-2018
James H Flory1, Sean Hennessy2, Clifford J Bailey3
1Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY floryj@mskcc.org.
Objective:
In 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revised metformin's label to permit use in patients with mild-moderate chronic kidney disease. We sought to determine whether this change was associated with increased reports of metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) to the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
Research Design And Methods:
Publicly available FAERS reports were analyzed.
Results:
MALA reports increased from 521 in 2015 to 1,939 in 2018. After restriction to U.S. reports, absolute and relative increase in MALA reports was less, from 111 to 243. The proportionate reporting ratio (PRR), a measure adjusted for rates of other adverse event reports, was stable.
Conclusions:
The increased reports deserve attention, but the PRR's stability and FAERS's known limitations, including lack of a denominator or control group, do not permit the conclusion that U.S. MALA rates have increased. Further study with more robust data sources is needed.
Insights
Reports of metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) increased after FDA label changes, but analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data suggests stable underlying rates. Further research is needed to confirm this trend.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacovigilance
- Nephrology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- In 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updated metformin labeling, allowing its use in patients with mild-moderate chronic kidney disease.
- This change prompted an investigation into potential associations with metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA).
Observation:
- Analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data revealed an increase in MALA reports from 2015 to 2018.
- A subset of U.S. reports showed a less pronounced increase.
- The proportionate reporting ratio (PRR) for MALA remained stable, indicating no significant change relative to other adverse events.
Findings:
- While overall MALA reports surged, the stable PRR suggests the increase may be influenced by reporting biases rather than a true rise in MALA incidence.
- Limitations of the FAERS database, such as the absence of a denominator and control group, preclude definitive conclusions about increased MALA rates.
Implications:
- The stability of the PRR suggests that current pharmacovigilance systems may not accurately reflect changes in MALA incidence following label revisions.
- Further investigation using more robust data sources is crucial to ascertain the actual impact of the 2016 FDA label change on MALA rates.
- These findings highlight the importance of critically evaluating adverse event reporting data and the need for comprehensive post-marketing surveillance.
Related Concept Videos
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are...
Glucagon-like Receptor Agonists
GLP-1, when administered in high doses intravenously, triggers insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon release, slows gastric emptying, reduces food intake, and restores normal insulin secretion. However, its rapid inactivation by...
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Absorption and Distribution

