Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

29.3K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
29.3K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

35.1K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.1K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

42.9K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
42.9K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

16.6K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.6K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

38.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.9K
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.6K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modified short-course fludarabine-based conditioning regimen for salvage cord blood transplantation after graft failure.

International journal of hematology·2026
Same author

Multifocal Neuroblastoma in Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome Harboring a Novel CREBBP Variant Identified by Paired Whole Genome Sequencing.

Congenital anomalies·2026
Same author

Urinary prostaglandin E major urinary metabolite in neonates: Gestational age at birth-dependent dynamics and clinical implications.

Pediatrics and neonatology·2026
Same author

Outcomes of early-phase ampicillin plus aminoglycosides versus ampicillin plus cefotaxime for preterm infants.

Pediatric research·2026
Same author

Drivers of temporal improvement in CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: a Japanese nationwide registry analysis.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

Decreased renal function predicts severe cytokine release syndrome after CAR-T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma.

British journal of haematology·2026
Same journal

[Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology·2026
Same journal

[Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology·2026
Same journal

[Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology·2026
Same journal

[Recent advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutic strategies for POEMS syndrome].

[Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology·2026
Same journal

[Recent advances in management of systemic AL amyloidosis].

[Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology·2026
Same journal

[Treatment strategies for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: proposals for optimal treatment sequencing].

[Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.6K

[To submit, or not to submit].

Motohiro Kato1

  • 1Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development.

[Rinsho Ketsueki] the Japanese Journal of Clinical Hematology
|October 11, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Beware of predatory journals that exploit the open-access model by charging high fees for minimal or no peer review. Relying on trusted colleague recommendations is crucial for scientists to avoid these scams and protect their reputation.

Keywords:
Article processing chargesJournal selectionOpen access

More Related Videos

Assessment of Submitochondrial Protein Localization in Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
08:55

Assessment of Submitochondrial Protein Localization in Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: July 19, 2021

3.3K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.6K
Assessment of Submitochondrial Protein Localization in Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
08:55

Assessment of Submitochondrial Protein Localization in Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: July 19, 2021

3.3K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K

Area of Science:

  • Scholarly publishing
  • Scientific communication

Background:

  • The open-access publishing model allows free reader access but involves article processing charges for authors.
  • An increasing number of low-quality, predatory journals exploit this model.
  • These journals often bypass rigorous peer review to collect fees.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To raise awareness about predatory journals.
  • To inform scientists about the risks associated with predatory publishing.
  • To provide guidance on identifying and avoiding corrupt journals.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the predatory publishing phenomenon.
  • Discussion of existing methods for journal evaluation (black lists, white lists).
  • Emphasis on the importance of professional reputation and colleague recommendations.

Main Results:

  • Predatory journals compromise scientific integrity by accepting papers without proper peer review.
  • Existing lists of corrupt or trustworthy journals are imperfect.
  • Reputation and collegial recommendations are vital for identifying legitimate journals.

Conclusions:

  • Scientists must be vigilant against predatory journals that exploit the open-access model.
  • Understanding the tactics of corrupt journals is essential for researchers.
  • Prioritizing journal reputation and seeking advice from trusted peers can mitigate risks.