Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual attention and stimulus identification.

H Pashler, P C Badgio

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
    |April 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Divided attention: Storing and classifying briefly presented objects.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
    Same author

    Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
    Same author

    Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: dominant role of uniqueness.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
    Same author

    Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses.

    Consciousness and cognition·2001
    Same author

    Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent?

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
    Same author

    Perception and production of brief durations: beat-based versus interval-based timing.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001

    This study suggests visual search involves parallel processing, where the brain identifies multiple familiar stimuli simultaneously. This capacity-limited parallel identification challenges serial processing models in visual perception.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Visual Perception
    • Human Information Processing

    Background:

    • Previous visual search research suggests parallel stimulus processing.
    • Concerns exist that target detection may occur without full target/distractor identification.
    • A novel task was designed to necessitate exhaustive identification.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate whether visual search tasks require exhaustive identification of stimuli.
    • To differentiate between serial and parallel processing models of visual encoding.
    • To examine the effects of display size and visual quality on stimulus identification.

    Main Methods:

    • Employed a novel task requiring subjects to name the highest digit in an array.
    • Manipulated display size and visual quality to assess processing models.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed reaction times and display size effects.

    • Main Results:

    • Reaction times and display size effects mirrored conventional visual search tasks.
    • Display size was additive with visual quality, contradicting serial processing models.
    • Visual quality influenced character recognition rate, not solely feature extraction.

    Conclusions:

    • Results support parallel, though potentially capacity-limited, identification of multiple familiar stimuli.
    • Parallel identification does not necessarily imply late selection in visual processing.
    • Alternative models to late selection warrant further investigation.