Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026
A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique
Published on: January 6, 2023
Analysis of computed tomography-based infra-acetabular morphometry to assess the feasibility of infra-acetabular
Shozo Kanezaki1,2, Masashi Miyazaki3, Naoki Notani1,2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu-shi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Introduction:
The number of pelvic fractures based on osteoporosis has been increasing. The infra-acetabular screw (IAS), which connected both osseous columns, is a safe method of screw placement going through the infra-acetabular corridor (IAC). However, the specifics of the anatomy of IAC have been far from completely understood, especially in the Asian population. The purpose of our study was to reveal the details of the IAC using computed tomography (CT) data.
Materials And Methods:
Traumatized in-patients having pelvic CT scans from 2014 to 2016 were enrolled. Pediatric and adult patients with pelvic fractures and hip prostheses were excluded. The male/female ratio and distribution of patients' age were equalized manually; 40 male and 40 female patients were included. The IAC was measured on the plane of the inlet view (25° caudal) in multi-planar reconstructed CT images.
Measurements:
infra-acetabular diameter (IAD), anterior-posterior length of the IAC (APL), length from the starting point of the IAC to the medial edge of the pelvis (LME), length from the starting point of the IAC to the top of the pubic symphysis (LPS), and tilting on inlet plate (TIP).
Results:
Age was 59 ± 22 (mean ± SD). Height was 159 ± 11 cm, and body mass index (BMI) was 22.9 ± 4.1. IAD, APL, LME, LPS, and TIP was 4.0 ± 1.3 mm, 89.5 ± 7.1 mm, 8.7 ± 3.6 mm, 57.8 ± 4.8 mm, and 4.7 ± 5.2°, respectively. Over 20% of corridors (35 of 160) were not feasible for IAS placement, because of inadequate width (less than 3.0 mm). Nine corridors (5.6%) had curvature in IAC, which meant technically demanding to insert IAS. There was no difference in IAD between male and female patients, while APL, LME, LPS, and TIP had sex-related differences.
Conclusions:
Surgeons should pay attention to the fact that over 20% of IACs are not feasible for infra-acetabular screw placement even with the perfect reduction of fragments when treating acetabular fractures.
