Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization as a Tool for HPV-Related Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis
Published on: June 14, 2019
Cytologic evaluation of p16 staining in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in CytoLyt versus formalin-fixed
Darren J Buonocore1, Evan Fowle1,2, Oscar Lin1
1Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Background:
The management of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)-related oropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are distinct from HNSCC linked to smoking and alcohol use. HR-HPV-positive HNSCC frequently presents as a cervical lymph node metastasis. Because fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is often the initial diagnostic procedure, evaluating HR-HPV status in cytology specimens is important. The overexpression of p16 is a surrogate for HR-HPV; however, the evaluation of p16 in FNAs remains controversial.
Methods:
From September 2015 to December 2016, cytopathologists performed 25 FNAs of neck lymph nodes that were suspicious for HR-HPV-positive HNSCC. Initial passes produced smears for on-site evaluation and CytoLyt material. Additional passes were formalin-fixed. A CytoLyt cell block (CCB) and a formalin-fixed cell block (FFCB) were prepared, and p16 immunocytochemistry was performed.
Results:
In 24 of 25 cases, the FFCB had diffuse (≥70% of cells), strong nuclear/cytoplasmic p16 staining. In all 24 of these cases, HR-HPV was detected by in situ hybridization. The corresponding CCB had weak-to-moderate p16 staining in <70% of cells (range, 5%-60% of cells) in 17 cases, 4 had weak-to-moderate diffuse staining, and 4 were acellular. The percentage of p16-positive cells was significantly higher with FFCB than with CCB (formalin: 94% ± 2%; CytoLyt, 38% ± 7%; 2-tailed, paired Student t test; P < .001; Fisher exact test, P < .001).
Conclusions:
The fixative used had a drastic impact on p16 staining, which explained the staining variability reported in the literature. FFCBs show a diffuse staining pattern, which correlates with HR-HPV status, whereas CCBs show a weaker and inconsistent staining pattern, which is more difficult to interpret.
More Related Videos
07:43Four-color Fluorescence Immunohistochemistry of T-cell Subpopulations in Archival Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Human Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Samples
Published on: July 29, 2017
10:21Protocol for HER2 FISH Using a Non-cross-linking, Formalin-free Tissue Fixative to Combine Advantages of Cryo-preservation and Formalin Fixation
Published on: December 25, 2017