CEA vs. stent in patients with acute strokes: are they equally effective?

Xzabia Caliste1, Adriana Laser2, R Clement Darling1

  • 1Division of Vascular Surgery, Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.

Insights

Carotid endarterectomy is effective for acute stroke management. While carotid stenting shows promise in select patients, endarterectomy remains a proven safe option for reducing stroke risk.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Stroke is a leading global cause of death, with extracranial carotid stenosis a major contributor to ischemic strokes.
  • Secondary stroke reduction strategies include carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting for acute stroke patients.
  • This review compares the available data on the equivalency of these two intervention options.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare the efficacy and safety of carotid endarterectomy versus carotid stenting for secondary stroke reduction in patients with acute symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed and other sources.
  • Keywords included: carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery stent, acute stroke, symptomatic carotid stenosis, flow reversal, TCAR.
  • Studies focused on asymptomatic disease were excluded.

Main Results:

  • Landmark trials (NASCET, CREST) and recent studies confirm the effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy for acute stroke.
  • Carotid stenting demonstrates acceptable outcomes in specific patient cohorts.
  • Carotid endarterectomy remains a highly effective and safe intervention.

Conclusions:

  • Carotid endarterectomy is a safe and effective treatment for acute stroke management.
  • Carotid stenting has limitations but is non-inferior in certain populations.
  • Technological advancements may broaden patient selection criteria for carotid stenting in the future.
Abstract