Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

9.3K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
9.3K
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

555
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
555
Errors in Taping01:18

Errors in Taping

280
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
280
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

13.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
13.8K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

365
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
365
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

43.4K
Overview
43.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Peer support after clinical incidents in veterinary care: Adopting the RISE (Resilience In Stressful Events) program.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Visualising veterinary patient safety-A modified Delphi study.

The Veterinary record·2025
Same author

Understanding veterinary practitioners' responses to adverse events using a combined grounded theory and netnographic natural language processing approach.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Ethical challenges experienced by veterinary practitioners in relation to adverse events: Insights from a qualitative study.

The Veterinary record·2023
Same author

Sustainability policies and practices at veterinary centres in the UK and Republic of Ireland.

The Veterinary record·2023
Same author

'We're gonna end up scared to do anything': A qualitative exploration of how client complaints are experienced by UK veterinary practitioners.

The Veterinary record·2022
Same journal

New bovine TB strategy for England.

The Veterinary record·2026
Same journal

BVA Scottish Branch's next president.

The Veterinary record·2026
Same journal

Meet your BVA team.

The Veterinary record·2026
Same journal

Celebrating excellence.

The Veterinary record·2026
Same journal

Get CMA compliant with new resources.

The Veterinary record·2026
Same journal

CVS Equine launches health and safety training.

The Veterinary record·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
11:08

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Published on: June 19, 2018

10.1K

Getting it right on mistakes.

Catherine Oxtoby

    The Veterinary Record
    |October 13, 2019
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Veterinary professionals can implement strategies to minimize medical errors and mitigate their impact on personal well-being. Proactive risk reduction benefits both patient care and practitioner mental health.

    More Related Videos

    Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
    07:07

    Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

    Published on: June 5, 2016

    9.1K
    Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
    09:30

    Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

    Published on: September 13, 2018

    9.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 5, 2026

    Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
    11:08

    Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis

    Published on: June 19, 2018

    10.1K
    Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
    07:07

    Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

    Published on: June 5, 2016

    9.1K
    Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
    09:30

    Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

    Published on: September 13, 2018

    9.9K

    Area of Science:

    • Veterinary Medicine
    • Professional Well-being

    Background:

    • Mistakes are common in veterinary practice and life.
    • Unmanaged errors can negatively affect veterinary professionals' well-being.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore methods for reducing the occurrence of errors in veterinary practice.
    • To identify strategies for mitigating the personal impact of mistakes on veterinary professionals.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of common error types in veterinary medicine.
    • Analysis of psychological impacts of errors on practitioners.
    • Development of risk management and self-care protocols.

    Main Results:

    • Specific techniques can decrease error frequency.
    • Interventions exist to lessen the emotional and psychological toll of mistakes.
    • Proactive management enhances both practice safety and professional resilience.

    Conclusions:

    • Implementing targeted strategies can significantly reduce veterinary errors.
    • Supporting practitioner well-being is crucial for a sustainable veterinary profession.
    • A dual approach to error reduction and well-being management is essential.