Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why solutions continue to elude us.

T H Murray

    Social Science & Medicine (1982)
    |January 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Drug Testing and Moral Responsibility.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Human Growth Hormone in Sports: No.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Guest Editorial.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Doping in sport: challenges for medicine, science and ethics.

    Journal of internal medicine·2008
    Same author

    The ethics of the use of technologically constructed high-altitude environments to enhance performances in sport.

    Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2007
    Same author

    Genetic ties and genetic mixups.

    Journal of medical ethics·2003
    Same journal

    Does education shield against vaccine hesitancy? Evidence from the East-West divide.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
    Same journal

    Health inequality aversion in China: Public and decision-maker views.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
    Same journal

    The role of medical evidence certifying PTSD for legal outcomes in Swedish asylum cases 2016-2020.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
    Same journal

    From presence to participation: Ethical engagement in community advisory boards for drug use research.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
    Same journal

    Why we need political values in epidemic modelling: parameters, populations, and public health policy goals.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
    Same journal

    Physical activity, indoor air pollution, and cognitive function among older-adults in India: Evidence of gendered environmental disadvantage.

    Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
    See all related articles

    This study examines the social and political factors influencing moral judgments regarding the selective nontreatment of newborns. It argues for transparent decision-making and acknowledges the broader societal implications of such choices.

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Moral Philosophy
    • Medical Ethics

    Background:

    • The selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns presents complex ethical challenges.
    • Robert Weir's book critically analyzes the moral and political dimensions of these decisions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the relationship between moral judgment, moral theory, and the social/political context.
    • To investigate the implications of labeling decisions in medical ethics.
    • To advocate for transparent and ethically sound decision-making processes.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of arguments concerning infant personhood and moral agency.
    • Examination of the language used to describe medical interventions and their consequences.
    • Critique of justifications for active killing versus selective nontreatment.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachDeath and EuthanasiaPhilosophical ApproachSelective Nontreatment of Handicapped Newborns (Weir, R.)

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Infant personhood arguments highlight the interplay between moral judgments and theories.
    • The labeling of treatment decisions carries significant moral and political weight.
    • Active killing is ethically indefensible when considering broader social factors.

    Conclusions:

    • Decisions regarding newborn treatment require careful consideration of their social and political context.
    • Transparent language is crucial for acknowledging the controversial nature of these choices.
    • Ethical solutions must address the complexities of moral dilemmas within social institutions.