Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

09:03
Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments
Published on: May 21, 2019
10.0K
Prey and predators perceive orb-web spider conspicuousness differently: evaluating alternative hypotheses for color
Nathalia G Ximenes1,2, Felipe M Gawryszewski1
1Animal Colouration and Evolution Lab, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Current Zoology
|October 17, 2019
Summary
Color polymorphisms in the crab spider Gasteracantha cancriformis may be driven by different prey and predator perceptions. This suggests multiple prey and predator hypotheses explain the evolution of these spider
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Animal Behavior
Background:
- Color polymorphisms are often explained by apostatic selection, where predators target common morphs.
- Perception of color is subjective and depends on the observer's visual system.
- Theoretical models suggest differing conspicuousness perceptions by predators and prey can drive polymorphism.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the evolutionary drivers of color polymorphism in the spider Gasteracantha cancriformis.
- To test the multiple prey, flower mimicry, and multiple predator hypotheses.
- To assess how different taxa perceive the conspicuousness of spider color morphs.
Main Methods:
- Collected reflectance data from G. cancriformis color morphs.
- Utilized color vision modeling to estimate chromatic and achromatic contrast.
- Evaluated morph conspicuousness from the perspective of various potential prey and predator taxa.
Main Results:
- Different taxa perceived the conspicuousness of spider morphs differently.
- The multiple prey hypothesis was supported.
- The multiple predator hypothesis was partially supported.
- The flower mimicry hypothesis was supported by color metrics but not by vision models.
Conclusions:
- Differential perception of conspicuousness by prey and predators likely maintains color polymorphism in G. cancriformis.
- The multiple prey and multiple predator hypotheses offer significant explanations for the observed polymorphism.
- Color vision models are crucial for understanding the ecological relevance of color patterns.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
20.9K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
20.9K
Mate Choice
11.5K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
11.5K
Frequency-dependent Selection
23.0K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
23.0K
Color Vision
1.3K
Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.
1.3K
Types of Selection
43.7K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
43.7K
Speciation Rates
22.5K
Overview
22.5K

