Correlations between microsatellite instability and the biological behaviour of tumours

Guang Yang1, Ru-Yi Zheng2, Zai-Shun Jin3

  • 1Department of Pathology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.

Abstract

Insights

Microsatellite instability (MSI) impacts tumor behavior and patient prognosis across various cancers. High-level MSI often correlates with better outcomes and can generate novel frameshift peptides for targeted cancer vaccines.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Oncology
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Microsatellites are repetitive DNA sequences comprising ~3% of the human genome.
  • Deficiency in DNA mismatch repair systems can lead to microsatellite instability (MSI), characterized by insertions or deletions in repetitive DNA units.
  • MSI is implicated in the biological behavior of various cancers, including colorectal, gastric, endometrial carcinomas, and lymphomas/leukemias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the relationship between microsatellite instability (MSI) and the biological behavior of colorectal carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, lymphoma/leukemia, and endometrial carcinoma.
  • To review the application of frameshift peptide vaccines in cancer therapy.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies from PubMed and Baidu Xueshu.
  • Search of ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant clinical trials.

Main Results:

  • Microsatellite instability presents in three subtypes: high-level MSI, low-level MSI, and stable microsatellites.
  • Patients with high-level MSI generally exhibit better treatment efficacy and prognosis compared to those with low-level MSI or stable microsatellites.
  • MSI in coding regions can lead to protein inactivation, contributing to tumorigenesis, and generate novel frameshift peptides that can elicit tumor-specific immune responses.

Conclusions:

  • Microsatellite instability (MSI) shows potential as a key predictor of tumor malignancy, treatment efficacy, and prognosis.
  • MSI patterns can inform individualized treatment strategies, particularly through the development of frameshift peptide vaccines.

Related Concept Videos

Microtubule Instability02:17

Microtubule Instability

Microtubules are hollow cylindrical filaments having a diameter of approximately 25 nm and a length that varies from 200 nm to 25 μm. GTP-bound tubulin subunits form αβ-heterodimers for microtubule assembly. These core building blocks interact longitudinally, polymerizing into protofilaments. The protofilaments then interact with one another through lateral bonding forces to form stable cylindrical microtubules. These cylindrical filaments are dynamic as they undergo repeated...
5.9K
The Tumor Microenvironment02:17

The Tumor Microenvironment

Every normal cell or tissue is embedded in a complex local environment called stroma, consisting of different cell types, a basal membrane, and blood vessels. As normal cells mutate and develop into cancer cells, their local environment also changes to allow cancer progression. The tumor microenvironment (TME) consists of a complex cellular matrix of stromal cells and the developing tumor. The cross-talk between cancer cells and surrounding stromal cells is critical to disrupt normal tissue...
7.6K
Tumor Progression02:07

Tumor Progression

Tumor progression is a phenomenon where the pre-formed tumor acquires successive mutations to become clinically more aggressive and malignant. In the 1950s, Foulds first described the stepwise progression of cancer cells through successive stages.
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
7.2K
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
1.8K