Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

545
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
545
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.0K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.0K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

332
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
332
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

40.9K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
40.9K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.4K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.4K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.1K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Substance use and the value of control.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same author

Abstinence from Substance Use & The Value of Control.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Flexible control as surrogate reward or dynamic reward maximization.

Cognition·2022
Same author

Analytic Causal Knowledge for Constructing Useable Empirical Causal Knowledge: Two Experiments on Pre-schoolers.

Cognitive science·2022
Same author

Stakes and expertise modulate conformity in economic choice.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

The Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Mediates a Preference for High-Agency Environments.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.3K

Neural Correlates of Causal Confounding.

Mimi Liljeholm1

  • 1University of California, Irvine.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|October 17, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Human reasoning is sensitive to causal confounding, where influences are intertwined. Brain activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) reflects this sensitivity, supporting Bayesian causal models over simpler error-driven ones.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Causal Inference
  • Computational Psychiatry

Background:

  • Causal confounding, where multiple causes covary, poses a challenge to discerning independent influences.
  • Behavioral studies indicate that humans, including children, possess an intuitive sensitivity to causal confounding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural substrates underlying human sensitivity to causal confounding.
  • To differentiate neural mechanisms supporting complex causal inference from simpler learning processes.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) combined with computational cognitive modeling.
  • Participants judged the influences of confounded and nonconfounded, deterministic and stochastic causes.
  • A Bayesian causal model and an error-driven algorithm were used to account for neural activity.

More Related Videos

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

483
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

43.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.3K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

483
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

43.8K

Main Results:

  • Neural activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) during causal judgments was better explained by a Bayesian model.
  • The Bayesian model, sensitive to both confounding and stochasticity, outperformed an error-driven algorithm that only accounted for stochasticity.
  • This suggests dmPFC activity supports sophisticated causal reasoning that considers confounding.

Conclusions:

  • The dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) plays a crucial role in mediating sensitivity to causal confounding.
  • Findings support the role of domain-general Bayesian causal inference mechanisms in human cognition.
  • Implications for understanding uncertainty estimation and causal induction are discussed.