Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
A comparison between two recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews on drug's safety
Ana Penedones1,2, Carlos Alves3,4, Francisco Batel Marques3,4
1Centre for Health Technology Assessment and Drug Research (CHAD), Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image (AIBILI), Azinhaga Sta. Comba, Celas, 3000-548, Coimbra, Portugal. anapenedones@gmail.com.
Background:
Several recommendations are available to conduct and report a systematic review of adverse drug reactions. This study is aimed at identifying and comparing the methodologies of the two most commonly used recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews on drug's safety.
Methods:
Two systematic reviews were conducted following the recommendations "Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions" and "Systematic Reviews' Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare." The methods of each recommendation were characterized, and the results and the discussion of each systematic review were also evaluated.
Results:
The methodologies of both recommendations are similar. The review question was structured. Both recommendations suggest to include pre- and post-marketing data. The recommended data sources differed and, consequently, the results of the systematic reviews (37 vs. 35 studies). Other aspects of search literature were identical. Different tools are suggested to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. For case reports, both recommendations only report some questions that may be helpful to assess risk of bias. The reporting of the results and discussion is also identical for both recommendations.
Conclusions:
Few methodological differences were observed between the analyzed recommendations to conduct a systematic review on drug's safety. Combining their methods into a single and recognized recommendation could be of great value.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Drug Regulation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

