Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity01:12

Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity

1.2K
Consider a coffee mug hanging on a hook in a pantry. If the mug gets knocked, it oscillates back and forth like a pendulum until the oscillations die out.
A simple pendulum can be described as a point mass and a string. Meanwhile, a physical pendulum is any object whose oscillations are similar to a simple pendulum, but cannot be modeled as a point mass on a string because its mass is distributed over a larger area. The behavior of a physical pendulum can be modeled using the principles of...
1.2K
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

770
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
770

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of recommended footwear fit upon in-shoe pressures in feet with diabetes-An exploratory study.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2026
Same author

Less Is More? Physical Inactivity and Increased Risk of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration-A Systematic Review.

Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews·2026
Same author

Maintaining function and participation through tailored 24-hour movement behaviours for people living with multiple long-term conditions and frailty (The PERSONAL-AGILITY study): Protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.

PloS one·2026
Same author

A Sedentary Behaviour Reduction Programme in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study.

International journal of vascular medicine·2026
Same author

Interactive deep learning for myocardial scar segmentation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance·2026
Same author

Shifting From Concept to Practice: The Co-adaptation of Tailored Health Education Training for Truck Drivers.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.3K

Towards a Portable Model to Discriminate Activity Clusters from Accelerometer Data.

Petra Jones1,2, Evgeny M Mirkes3, Tom Yates4,5

  • 1Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK. pj100@leicester.ac.uk.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 20, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Unsupervised machine learning created a reusable physical activity classification model from accelerometer data. This model showed reasonable robustness when applied to diverse independent datasets, including free-living conditions.

Keywords:
accelerometerclusteringmachine learningphysical activityunsupervisedwalkingwrist-worn

More Related Videos

Assessment of Physical Activity Intensity with Accelerometers and Oxygen Consumption
08:45

Assessment of Physical Activity Intensity with Accelerometers and Oxygen Consumption

Published on: June 20, 2025

453
A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

12.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.3K
Assessment of Physical Activity Intensity with Accelerometers and Oxygen Consumption
08:45

Assessment of Physical Activity Intensity with Accelerometers and Oxygen Consumption

Published on: June 20, 2025

453
A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

12.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Wearable Technology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Classifying physical activity from accelerometer data is crucial for health monitoring.
  • Few existing methods are validated on multiple independent datasets.
  • Generalizability of models to diverse populations and settings remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate unsupervised machine learning for developing a reusable and generalizable physical activity classification model.
  • To assess the model's performance on independent laboratory and free-living datasets.
  • To determine the viability of unsupervised approaches for analyzing accelerometer data.

Main Methods:

  • A k-means clustering model was developed using two labeled adult laboratory datasets.
  • The unsupervised clustering model was applied to three independent labeled datasets (two laboratory, one free-living).
  • Clusters were collapsed into four activity categories: sedentary, standing/mixed/slow ambulatory, brisk ambulatory, and running.

Main Results:

  • The model achieved high accuracy (89-96%) for activity categories on development data.
  • Consistency of activity types within clusters remained above 70% for sedentary and 85% for ambulatory/running on independent datasets.
  • Acceleration features within clusters were consistent across samples, indicating robustness.

Conclusions:

  • Unsupervised machine learning offers a potentially useful approach for analyzing accelerometer data.
  • The developed clustering model demonstrates reasonable generalizability to diverse datasets.
  • This method shows promise for analyzing free-living physical activity data.