Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Federal housing assistance, cancer care, and overall survival among older adults with prostate cancer.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Two-way fixed effects models in air pollution epidemiology: a proposed framework for model specifications and recommendations for future studies.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

A global scoping review of clinical practice guidelines for cataract surgery.

AJO international·2026
Same author

Intrathoracic breast implants for postpneumonectomy syndrome: A systematic review of safety and efficacy.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

Using the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit to Fund Assisted Living: Mapping the Current Environment.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association·2025
Same author

Multidisciplinary Care in Body Contouring: An Integrative Approach to Enhancing Outcomes.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2025
Same journal

The Free-Style Flaps: A Personal Journey in Clinical Practice, Surgical Pearls and Common Pitfalls.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

The Role of Microsurgical Free Flap in Complex Nose Defect Reconstruction.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

International Microsurgery Club for 10 Years-A New Online Education Platform and Beyond.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Isolated Lower Extremity Specimens Enhance Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness in Cadaveric Flap Dissection Training for Clinical Practice-Chang Gung Experience.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Neuroplastic and Augmented Reality Integration in Moyamoya Revascularization: A Reconstructive Microsurgical Paradigm.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Chang Gung Experience (Part 4): Organization of a Microsurgical Center for Service Education and Research and Miscellaneous Microsurgical Reconstruction.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

4.0K

Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Jordan Kaplan1, Ryan D Wagner1, Tara L Braun1

  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Seminars in Plastic Surgery
|October 22, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Prepectoral breast reconstruction has improved due to surgical advances, but patient selection remains key. Direct comparisons with submuscular placement are needed for evidence-based surgical decisions.

Keywords:
breast reconstructionprepectoralsubcutaneous approach

More Related Videos

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

741
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema
05:44

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema

Published on: January 12, 2017

10.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

4.0K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

741
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema
05:44

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema

Published on: January 12, 2017

10.5K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Prepectoral breast reconstruction, initially performed in the 1960s, faced high complication rates, leading to a shift towards submuscular placement.
  • Submuscular implant placement also presented its own set of complications.
  • Recent surgical and technological advancements have prompted a re-evaluation of prepectoral breast reconstruction techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution of prepectoral breast reconstruction techniques.
  • To highlight the improved complication profiles of modern prepectoral breast reconstruction.
  • To emphasize the critical role of patient selection in prepectoral implant placement success.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of prepectoral and submuscular breast reconstruction techniques.
  • Analysis of complication rates associated with both prepectoral and submuscular implant placements.
  • Discussion of recent advancements influencing prepectoral breast reconstruction outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Early prepectoral reconstruction attempts were associated with high complication rates.
  • Submuscular placement became the standard but had its own drawbacks.
  • Current prepectoral breast reconstruction techniques show improved complication profiles due to advancements.
  • Patient selection is crucial for successful prepectoral implant outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Prepectoral breast reconstruction has evolved significantly, with improved safety profiles.
  • While prepectoral placement is viable, it is not universally suitable, underscoring the importance of careful patient selection.
  • Further direct comparative studies between prepectoral and submuscular breast implant placement are necessary to guide evidence-based clinical decision-making and operative planning.