Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026
13:35
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
4.0K
Update in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
Aurelia Trisliana Perdanasari1, Amjed Abu-Ghname1, Sarth Raj1
1Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Seminars in Plastic Surgery
|October 22, 2019
Summary
Direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction offers a one-stage breast reconstruction option following mastectomy. The choice between DTI and two-stage reconstruction depends on patient health, complication risks, and costs.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Oncology
- Reconstructive Surgery
Background:
- Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is a common choice for post-mastectomy patients.
- IBR can be performed in one or two stages.
- Advancements in surgical techniques have improved one-stage reconstruction options.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the considerations for choosing between one-stage (direct-to-implant) and two-stage breast reconstruction.
- To highlight the factors influencing the decision-making process for post-mastectomy reconstruction.
Main Methods:
- Review of current surgical techniques in implant-based breast reconstruction.
- Analysis of factors influencing the selection of reconstruction approach.
Main Results:
- One-stage reconstruction, or direct-to-implant (DTI), involves immediate implant placement during mastectomy.
- Two-stage reconstruction involves a tissue expander followed by a permanent implant.
- Decision factors include patient health, complication risk, and economic considerations.
Conclusions:
- The selection between direct-to-implant and two-stage breast reconstruction is multifactorial.
- Patient-specific factors and resource management are critical in choosing the optimal IBR approach.
