Related Experiment Videos
The state of what art?
1Facial Rehabilitation Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
The Cleft Palate Journal
|April 1, 1988
Summary
Psychological research on cleft palate requires higher scientific standards. Current clinical-scientist models limit theoretical development and research impact in behavioral science.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Behavioral Science
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Psychological studies must align with contemporary research standards.
- The prevalent clinical-scientist model overemphasizes clinical practice, neglecting scientific rigor.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critique the current state of psychological research on cleft palate.
- To advocate for improved research design and theoretical relevance in behavioral science.
Main Methods:
- Critical analysis of existing psychological research methodologies.
- Evaluation of the impact of the clinical-scientist model on research quality.
Main Results:
- Psychological research on cleft palate lacks theoretical depth and visibility.
- Studies often fail to establish clear relationships between conditions like cleft palate and outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The field faces mediocrity due to insufficient scientific standards.
- Advancement requires a stronger emphasis on the scientist role within the clinical-scientist model.