Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Bivalirudin Versus Heparin During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Hiten Patel1,2, Rana Garris2, Suchit Bhutani3
1Department of Cardiology, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Campbell University, Fayetteville, NC, USA.
Insights
Bivalirudin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) show similar outcomes for acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Bivalirudin increased stent thrombosis, especially in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and its bleeding benefit was lost with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Comparing bivalirudin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Previous studies indicated bivalirudin had less bleeding but more stent thrombosis.
- Evolving antiplatelet strategies may alter the comparative efficacy and safety profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus UFH in AMI patients undergoing PCI.
- To evaluate the impact of modern adjunct antiplatelet strategies on outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 22,844 patients.
- Utilized Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 for data analysis.
- Compared bivalirudin to UFH in patients with acute myocardial infarction requiring revascularization.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) or cardiovascular mortality between bivalirudin and UFH.
- Bivalirudin significantly increased acute stent thrombosis, particularly in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) trials.
- Bivalirudin reduced major bleeding, but this benefit was nullified when glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) were used provisionally.
Conclusions:
- Bivalirudin and UFH offer comparable MACE and cardiovascular mortality in AMI patients undergoing PCI.
- Increased acute stent thrombosis with bivalirudin is a concern, especially in STEMI.
- The bleeding advantage of bivalirudin is diminished with current provisional GPI use.
Background:
The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with acute myocardial infarction who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Earlier trials comparing bivalirudin and UFH during PCI demonstrated that bivalirudin caused less bleeding with more stent thrombosis. Since then, adjunct antiplatelet strategies have evolved. Improved upstream platelet inhibition with potent P2Y12 inhibitors decreased the need for routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI), resulting in similar outcomes among UFH and bivalirudin. Therefore, the role of bivalirudin in modern PCI practices is questionable.
Methods:
We utilized Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 to perform a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 22,844 patients to compare bivalirudin to UFH in patients with acute myocardial infarction requiring revascularization.
Results:
There was no difference between bivalirudin and UFH regarding major adverse cardiac events (MACE), risk ratio (RR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 - 1.12; P = 0.83) or cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.71 - 1.07; P = 0.18). Bivalirudin increased acute stent thrombosis (RR 2.77, 95% CI 1.49 - 5.13; P = 0.001), which was only significant among ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) only trials. Bivalirudin caused less major bleeding (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49 - 0.90; P = 0.007), which was negated when GPI was used provisionally (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.64 - 1.33; P = 0.67).
Conclusions:
Among patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent PCI, bivalirudin and UFH demonstrated similar MACE and cardiovascular mortality. Bivalirudin increased acute stent thrombosis, which was more remarkable among STEMI. Bivalirudin decreased major bleeding, but this benefit was negated when GPI was used provisionally.
More Related Videos
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
14:24Percutaneous Contrast Echocardiography-guided Intramyocardial Injection and Cell Delivery in a Large Preclinical Model
Published on: January 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...