Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026
Stereo-Electro-Encephalo-Graphy SEEG With Robotic Assistance in the Presurgical Evaluation of Medical Refractory Epilepsy: A Technical Note
Published on: June 13, 2016
Refractory seizures: Prediction of outcome of surgical intervention based on results from PET-CT, PET-MRI and
Rashad Johnson1, Grace Rizk1, Harleen Kaur1
1Nuclear Medicine Section, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
Purpose:
The purpose of this article is to evaluate the effectiveness of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) and PET-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with scalp and intracranial electroencephalogram (EEG) in predicting surgical outcomes in patients with refractory seizures.
Methods:
Patients who underwent PET-CT and MRI fusion, scalp and intracranial EEG, and subsequent surgical intervention were retrospectively included. PET-CT were fused with MRI and interpreted by an experienced blinded reader. An area of hypometabolism on PET was identified as the location of the epileptic focus. The site of seizure focus was correlated with scalp and intracranial EEG findings. Surgical outcomes were evaluated. Thirty-six patients were included; all had presurgical PET-CT, scalp EEG, and PET-MRI fusion, and 28 of these patients had intracranial EEGs.
Results:
PET-CT showed concordance of epileptic foci with scalp EEG in 7/36 patients (19%) and with intracranial EEG in 9/28 patients (32%). PET-MRI was concordant with scalp EEG in 6/36 patients (17%) and with intracranial EEG in 8/28 patients (29%). All patients with concordance of epileptic foci between PET-CT and PET-MRI and scalp EEG had improvement or resolution of seizures postintervention, and 89% of patients had concordance between intracranial EEG and PET studies. However, 45% of patients with discordant PET-CT and scalp EEG, 37% with discordance PET-CT and intracranial EEG, 43% with discordant PET-MRI and scalp EEG, and 35% of patients with discordant PET-MRI and intracranial EEG did not improve postsurgically.
Conclusion:
Concordance of epileptic foci localization between PET imaging and EEG yields favorable postoperative outcome in nearly all patients, whereas discordance has an equal probability of favorable vs unfavorable outcomes.
