Technical and procedural outcomes of the retrograde approach to chronic total occlusion interventions

Peter Tajti1, Iosif Xenogiannis, Fotis Gargoulas

  • 1Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Insights

The retrograde approach for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used for complex cases but has lower success rates and higher complication risks compared to antegrade-only PCI.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Vascular Medicine

Background:

  • The retrograde approach is essential for successful chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • However, this technique is linked to increased complication risks.
  • Contemporary outcomes require examination to identify areas for improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the outcomes of the retrograde approach in contemporary CTO PCI.
  • To compare retrograde versus antegrade-only CTO PCI outcomes.
  • To identify areas needing improvement in retrograde CTO PCI.

Main Methods:

  • A multicentre registry (PROGRESS-CTO) compared retrograde (n=1,515) and antegrade-only (n=2,686) CTO PCIs.
  • Patient demographics, lesion complexity (J-CTO score), collateral channel use, and procedural outcomes were analyzed.
  • In-hospital major complications, including mortality and acute myocardial infarction, were compared.

Main Results:

  • Retrograde PCI patients were older, predominantly male, and had higher rates of prior cardiovascular events and interventions.
  • The mean J-CTO score was significantly higher for retrograde PCI (3±1 vs 2±1).
  • Technical success (79% vs 91%) and procedural success (75% vs 90%) were lower with the retrograde approach. Major complications were higher in the retrograde group (5.1% vs 0.8%), including mortality (1.1% vs 0.1%) and acute myocardial infarction (1.9% vs 0.2%).

Conclusions:

  • The retrograde approach for CTO PCI is utilized in more complex lesions.
  • This approach is associated with lower technical and procedural success rates.
  • Higher rates of major complications, including mortality and myocardial infarction, are observed with the retrograde technique.
Abstract