Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
Published on: October 6, 2023
Evaluation of plan quality improvements in PlanIQ-guided Autoplanning
Bojarajan Perumal1,2, Harikrishna Etti Sundaresan2, Vaitheeswaran Ranganathan1
1Philips Health Systems, Philips India Ltd, Bangalore, India.
Aim:
Philips recently integrated PlanIQ with Autoplan® in Pinnacle3 TPS (V16.2). The objective of the present work is to quantitatively demonstrate how this integration improves the plan quality.
Background:
Pinnacle3 Autoplan® is the tool that generates the treatment plans with clinically acceptable plan quality with less manual intervention. In the recent past, a new tool called PlanIQ (Sun Nuclear Corp.) was introduced for a priori estimation of the best possible sparing of an organ at risk (OAR) for a given patient anatomy. Philips has recently integrated PlanIQ tool with Autoplan® for a seamless and efficient planning workflow.
Materials And Methods:
We have performed this evaluation in Pinnacle3 TPS (V.16.2) for the VMAT treatment technique. All plans were created using Varian True beam machine with the dual arc technique. Basically, we created two sets of VMAT plans using 6 MV photons. In the first set of VMAT plans (AP_RTOG), we used OAR goals from either RTOG guidelines to perform optimization using Autoplan®. Subsequently, we exported the same dataset to the PlanIQ system to perform feasibility analysis on the OAR goals. These newly obtained OAR goals from PlanIQ were used to generate the other set of plans (AP_PlanIQ plans). We compared the dosimetric results from these two sets of plans in five cases, such as brain, head & neck, lung, abdomen and prostate.
Results:
We compared the dosimetric results for AP_RTOG and AP_PlanIQ plans. We used RTOG guidelines to evaluate the plans and observed that while both sets of plans were meeting the RTOG guidelines in terms of OAR sparing, the AP_PlanIQ plans were significantly better in terms of OAR sparing as compared to AP_RTOG plans without any compromise in the target coverage.
Conclusion:
The results indicate that, although Autoplan helps achieve the user-defined goals without much manual intervention, the plan quality (OAR sparing) can be significantly improved without taking many iterative steps when PlanIQ suggested clinical goals are used in the Autoplan-based optimization.
Advances In Knowledge:
At present, there are no published material available about the efficacy of the integration of PlanIQ with Autoplanning®. In the present work, our objective is to evaluate the improvements in plan quality resulting from this integration.
More Related Videos
08:25Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018
05:47Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Quality Assurance
Planning Nursing Care I
Planning Nursing Care II
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...