Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.7K
Variation01:19

Variation

7.7K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
7.7K
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

725
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
725
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

8.2K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.2K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Incorporating external risk information with the Cox model under population heterogeneity: applications to trans-ancestry polygenic hazard scores.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society)·2026
Same author

Statistical inference for high-dimensional generalized estimating equations.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Robust Privacy-Preserving Models for Cluster-Level Confounding: Recognizing Disparities in Access to Transplantation.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same author

Asymmetric integration of various cancer datasets for identifying risk-associated variants and genes.

Bioinformatics advances·2025
Same author

Equivalency Between the Generalized Bivariate Bernoulli Model Dependency Test and a Logistic Regression Model With Interaction Effects.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Integrative Multiomics for Prognostic Assessment in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Circulation. Heart failure·2025
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
09:18

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.4K

The profile inter-unit reliability.

Kevin He1,2, Claudia Dahlerus2, Lu Xia1,2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Biometrics
|October 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new reliability measure for healthcare quality assessment, showing it better identifies extreme provider performance than traditional methods. This approach enhances the evaluation of dialysis facilities and patient outcomes.

Keywords:
health provider profilinginter-unit reliabilitynational dialysis dataquality of carereliability

More Related Videos

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
08:40

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

7.8K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
09:18

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.4K
Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
08:40

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

7.8K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Healthcare quality is assessed using patient outcomes to identify provider performance.
  • Inter-unit reliability (IUR) is a common metric, but its size does not directly correlate with a measure's usefulness for identifying extreme outcomes.
  • Existing metrics may not accurately reflect a quality measure's value in profiling providers with extreme results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and examine an alternative reliability measure for healthcare quality assessment.
  • To develop a metric that more directly assesses a quality measure's value in identifying providers with extreme outcomes.
  • To evaluate the proposed reliability measure using national dialysis data.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel reliability metric focused on the consistency of provider profiling over repeated measurements.
  • Applied the new metric to various quality measures for dialysis facilities.
  • Utilized national dialysis data for empirical examination.

Main Results:

  • The proposed reliability measure directly assesses the utility of quality measures for identifying extreme provider performance.
  • Traditional IUR may not be the most effective indicator for identifying high- or low-performing providers.
  • The new metric demonstrated its value in evaluating dialysis facility quality.

Conclusions:

  • A new reliability metric offers a more direct assessment of quality measure utility for provider profiling.
  • This approach improves the identification of extreme performance among healthcare providers, such as dialysis facilities.
  • The findings support the use of this enhanced reliability measure in healthcare quality evaluation.