Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026
Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
Published on: May 8, 2014
A characterisation of established unilateral transfemoral amputee gait using 3D kinematics, kinetics and oxygen
Bruce Carse1, Helen Scott1, Laura Brady1
1West of Scotland Rehabilitation and Mobility Centre, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Background:
Persons with unilateral transfemoral (UTF) amputation are known to walk with less efficiency than able-bodied individuals, therefore understanding the gait deviations that drive this inefficiency was considered to be important.
Research Questions:
What are the differences in gait outcomes between persons with UTF amputation and able-bodied persons? What is the prevalence of specific gait deviations within this group?
Methods:
Using a cross-sectional study design, the level over ground gait of established prosthetics service users with UTF amputation using mechanical knee joints (n=60) were compared with able-bodied persons (n=10). Gait profile score, walking velocity, step length, step length symmetry ratio, step time symmetry ratio, vertical ground reaction force symmetry index, base of support, centre of mass deviation and metabolic energy expenditure were measured. All data were captured during walking on level ground at a self-selected speed. Prevalence of gait deviations for each UTF participant were assessed by inspection, using a predefined list of lower limb kinematic, upper body kinematic, ground reaction force and lower limb kinetic gait deviations.
Results:
Statistically significant between-groups differences across all outcome measures were found, with all p-values <0.005, and effect sizes ranging from 'large' to 'huge'. The most prevalent gait deviations included: lack of prosthetic knee flexion in early stance (98%); lack of hip extension on the prosthetic side in late stance (82%): increased trunk side flexion range of motion across the gait cycle (92%); reduced anterior propulsion force on the prosthetic side in late stance (100%) and reduced prosthetic hip adduction moment in early stance (96%).
Significance:
The results of this study indicate that the magnitude of the differences between UTF amputees and able-bodied persons, across a comprehensive range of gait measures, are such that significant research into all aspects of prosthetic rehabilitation to reduce these differences is clearly justified.
