Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Appropriate Shocks and Mortality in Patients With Versus Without Diabetes With Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter
M Juhani Junttila1, Ari Pelli2, Tuomas V Kenttä2
1Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland juhani.junttila@oulu.fi.
Insights
Patients with diabetes receiving prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) face higher mortality despite fewer shocks. This suggests ICDs may offer limited survival benefits for diabetic patients with heart dysfunction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diabetology
- Public Health
Background:
- Diabetes mellitus is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease, including sudden cardiac death (SCD).
- The mechanisms underlying increased mortality in diabetic patients with cardiac conditions remain incompletely understood.
- Prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are used to prevent SCD, but their effectiveness in diabetic populations requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of appropriate ICD shocks and all-cause mortality in patients with and without diabetes who received prophylactic ICDs.
- To elucidate the impact of diabetes on the efficacy of primary prevention ICD therapy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 3,535 patients from the EU-CERT-ICD registry who received prophylactic ICDs.
- Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of diabetes (995 diabetic patients).
- Primary endpoints included appropriate ICD shocks and all-cause mortality, with a mean follow-up of 3.2 years.
Main Results:
- Diabetic patients experienced a lower incidence of appropriate ICD shocks (adjusted HR 0.77, P=0.02).
- Conversely, patients with diabetes exhibited significantly higher all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.30, P=0.001).
- The mean age was 63.7 years, with 82% males, and 28% of patients had diabetes.
Conclusions:
- All-cause mortality is elevated in diabetic patients with prophylactic ICDs compared to non-diabetic counterparts.
- The reduced incidence of appropriate shocks in diabetics suggests that excess mortality may not stem primarily from ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
- Prophylactic ICD therapy may have limitations in improving survival for diabetic patients with impaired left ventricular function.
Objective:
Diabetes increases the risk of all-cause mortality and sudden cardiac death (SCD). The exact mechanisms leading to sudden death in diabetes are not well known. We compared the incidence of appropriate shocks and mortality in patients with versus without diabetes with a prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) included in the retrospective EU-CERT-ICD registry.
Research Design And Methods And Results:
A total of 3,535 patients from 12 European EU-CERT-ICD centers with a mean age of 63.7 ± 11.2 years (82% males) at the time of ICD implantation were included in the analysis. A total of 995 patients (28%) had a history of diabetes. All patients had an ICD implanted for primary SCD prevention. End points were appropriate shock and all-cause mortality. Mean follow-up time was 3.2 ± 2.3 years. Diabetes was associated with a lower risk of appropriate shocks (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77 [95% CI 0.62-0.96], P = 0.02). However, patients with diabetes had significantly higher mortality (adjusted HR 1.30 [95% CI 1.11-1.53], P = 0.001).
Conclusions:
All-cause mortality is higher in patients with diabetes than in patients without diabetes with primary prophylactic ICDs. Subsequently, patients with diabetes have a lower incidence of appropriate ICD shocks, indicating that the excess mortality might not be caused primarily by ventricular tachyarrhythmias. These findings suggest a limitation of the potential of prophylactic ICD therapy to improve survival in patients with diabetes with impaired left ventricular function.
More Related Videos
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
07:39Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies