Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 15, 2016
Interpreting Evidence of Torture
Bernard Wn Robertson1, Charles Eh Berger2
1Barrister, Wellington, New Zealand; Department of Law, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract:
The Istanbul Protocol provides a scheme for giving evidence of signs of torture. This scheme does not conform with the principles of logical inference, revolving as it does round the concept of 'consistency'. The shortcomings of the Protocol are explained using the evidence given in the recent case of KV(Sri Lanka) and the logical approach to such evidence explained.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Traumatic Memory
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts II

