Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
A configural model of expert judgement as a preliminary epidemiological study of injury problems: An application to
Damian Morgan1, Joan Ozanne-Smith2
1Federation Business School, Federation University Australia, Churchill, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract:
Robust epidemiological studies identifying determinants of negative health outcomes require significant research effort. Expert judgement is proposed as an efficient alternative or preliminary research design for risk factor identification associated with unintentional injury. This proposition was tested in a multi-factorial balanced experimental design using specialist judges (N = 18), lifeguards and surfers, to assess the risk contribution to drowning for swimming ability, surf bathing experience, and wave height. All factors provided unique contributions to drowning risk (p < .001). An interaction (p = .02) indicated that occasional surf bathers face a proportionally increased risk of drowning at increased wave heights relative to experienced surf bathers. Although findings were limited by strict criteria, and no gold standard comparison data were available, the study provides new evidence on causal risk factors for a drowning scenario. Countermeasures based on these factors are proposed. Further application of the method may assist in developing new interventions to reduce unintentional injury.
Related Concept Videos
The Availability Heuristic
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Introduction to Epidemiology
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway

