Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trialability.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2025
Same author

Moral philosophy has much more to offer.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2022
Same author

Editorial: The Psychology of Pseudoscience.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same author

The ethics of explantation.

BMC medical ethics·2021
Same author

Who should be tested in a pandemic? Ethical considerations.

BMC medical ethics·2021
Same author

Neuroethics for Fantasyland or for the Clinic? The Limitations of Speculative Ethics.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Surgical Training for the Implantation of Neocortical Microelectrode Arrays Using a Formaldehyde-fixed Human Cadaver Model
08:11

Surgical Training for the Implantation of Neocortical Microelectrode Arrays Using a Formaldehyde-fixed Human Cadaver Model

Published on: November 19, 2017

11.8K

The Ethics of Cranial Nerve Implants.

Sven Ove Hansson1

  • 1Division of Philosophy, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Teknikringen 76, Stockholm 100 44, Sweden; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.

Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
|October 26, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Ethical considerations for cranial nerve implants are reviewed, including consent, security, and potential societal impacts. Addressing these issues is crucial for responsible development and equitable access to neurotechnology.

Keywords:
Auditory brainstem implantCochlear implantCranial nerve implantEthicsExplantationHypoglossal nerve stimulationInformed consentVagus nerve stimulation

More Related Videos

Surgical Implantation of Chronic Neural Electrodes for Recording Single Unit Activity and Electrocorticographic Signals
08:26

Surgical Implantation of Chronic Neural Electrodes for Recording Single Unit Activity and Electrocorticographic Signals

Published on: February 24, 2012

48.1K
Author Spotlight: Streamlined Brain and Skull Modeling for Enhanced Neurosurgical Planning in NHP Research
06:33

Author Spotlight: Streamlined Brain and Skull Modeling for Enhanced Neurosurgical Planning in NHP Research

Published on: February 9, 2024

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Surgical Training for the Implantation of Neocortical Microelectrode Arrays Using a Formaldehyde-fixed Human Cadaver Model
08:11

Surgical Training for the Implantation of Neocortical Microelectrode Arrays Using a Formaldehyde-fixed Human Cadaver Model

Published on: November 19, 2017

11.8K
Surgical Implantation of Chronic Neural Electrodes for Recording Single Unit Activity and Electrocorticographic Signals
08:26

Surgical Implantation of Chronic Neural Electrodes for Recording Single Unit Activity and Electrocorticographic Signals

Published on: February 24, 2012

48.1K
Author Spotlight: Streamlined Brain and Skull Modeling for Enhanced Neurosurgical Planning in NHP Research
06:33

Author Spotlight: Streamlined Brain and Skull Modeling for Enhanced Neurosurgical Planning in NHP Research

Published on: February 9, 2024

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Bioethics
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Cranial nerve implants represent a significant advancement in neurotechnology.
  • These implants raise complex ethical and social questions that require careful consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of the ethical and social issues associated with cranial nerve implants.
  • To identify key areas for discussion and policy development in neurotechnology ethics.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of ethical frameworks.
  • Analysis of current and emerging applications of cranial nerve implants.
  • Discussion of societal and cultural implications.

Main Results:

  • Key ethical challenges include informed consent, risk-benefit analysis, and data security.
  • Social issues encompass equity, cultural impact (e.g., on deaf subculture), and the potential for enhancement.
  • Research ethics specific to neuroprosthetics require dedicated attention.

Conclusions:

  • Proactive ethical deliberation is essential for the responsible innovation and deployment of cranial nerve implants.
  • Addressing these multifaceted issues will guide the development of guidelines for neurotechnology.
  • Ensuring equitable access and mitigating unintended social consequences are paramount.