Congenital Nephrotic Syndrome in India in the Current Era: A Multicenter Case Series
Rajiv Sinha1,2, Anil Vasudevan3, Indira Agarwal4
1Division of Paediatric Nephrology, Institute of Child Health, Kolkata, India, rajivsinha_in@yahoo.com.
Insights
Congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS) in India shows poor outcomes and limited genetic testing. Early response to treatment improves survival rates in children with CNS.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Genetics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS) data is scarce in developing nations.
- Limited information exists on CNS epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment outcomes in these regions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment outcomes of CNS in India.
- To highlight the challenges and outcomes of managing CNS in a developing country context.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 65 children diagnosed with CNS across 12 Indian pediatric nephrology centers (2012-2017).
- Analysis of clinical data, genetic testing results (including next-generation sequencing), and treatment responses.
- Evaluation of follow-up data and mortality rates.
Main Results:
- Genetic mutations were identified in 10 out of 15 children tested (80% yield with NGS).
- High mortality rate (53%) among non-responders compared to responders (p=0.004).
- Significant loss to follow-up (34%) and suboptimal initial management observed.
Conclusions:
- This study represents the largest series on CNS from India, revealing suboptimal management and poor outcomes.
- There is a low rate of genetic evaluation for CNS cases in India.
- Improved treatment response correlates with better survival in CNS patients.
Background:
There is a paucity of information on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment outcomes of congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS) in developing countries.
Methods:
Retrospective (2012-2017) review of case records undertaken across 12 Indian pediatric nephrology centers.
Results:
Sixty-five children (58% male, median birth weight 2.4 kg [interquartile range (IQR) 2.1-2.86]) were identified with CNS. Nearly half (45%) were preterm with previous history of fetal loss/sibling death in 22% and history of consanguinity in a third. No infective etiology was confirmed. Genetic reports available for 15 (23%) children identified causal mutations in 10 (8 in NPHS1 [1 novel variant], 1 in WT 1 [novel variant], and 1 in PLCE-1 gene). In addition, 1 child was clinically diagnosed as Galloway Mowat syndrome. Next-generation sequencing showed 80% yield and Sanger sequencing 20%. Albumin infusion and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were used initially in around two-third of cohort, while only 12% of children received indomethacin. Totally, 22 (34%) children were lost to follow-up after initial visit, and among the rest median follow-up was 69 days (IQR 20-180) with 18 (42%) deaths. Eight children showed partial response (including 2 with NPHS1 compound mutation), 1 complete response, and all of them were alive at last follow-up in contrast to 53% mortality among nonresponders, p = 0.004.
Conclusion:
This largest reported series on CNS from India revealed suboptimal management with poor outcome as well as low number of CNS being subjected to genetic evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Nephrotic Syndrome I : Introduction
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management
Nephrotic Syndrome III : Nursing Management
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction


