Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

11:16
Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
Published on: July 22, 2014
16.6K
A Phase Variable Approach for Improved Rhythmic and Non-Rhythmic Control of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis
Siavash Rezazadeh1, David Quintero2, Nikhil Divekar1
1Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Summary
This study introduces a novel controller for multi-joint prosthetic legs, enabling both rhythmic walking and complex non-rhythmic movements. The new system significantly reduces amputee compensations and improves real-world maneuverability.
Area of Science:
- Robotics
- Biomechanics
- Prosthetics
Background:
- Current multi-joint prosthetic leg control excels at rhythmic tasks like walking but struggles with non-rhythmic motions and real-world maneuvers.
- Developing adaptable control systems is crucial for enhancing prosthetic leg functionality and user independence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel controller for multi-joint prosthetic legs capable of both rhythmic and non-rhythmic movements.
- To enable seamless transitions between different speeds and tasks, and to incorporate volitional leg motions.
- To reduce compensatory movements in amputee users during prosthetic leg use.
Main Methods:
- A new piecewise holonomic phase variable was developed as the controller's foundation.
- A finite state machine, using thigh angle measurements and foot contact sensing, managed transitions.
- The controller was implemented on a powered knee-ankle prosthesis and tested with a transfemoral amputee.
Main Results:
- The transfemoral amputee subject successfully performed diverse tasks: walking (slow/fast, backward), starting/stopping, obstacle negotiation, and kicking a ball.
- Clinically significant reductions in compensatory movements (e.g., vaulting, hip circumduction) were observed during rhythmic tasks compared to a passive prosthesis.
- Considerable improvements in performance were noted for non-rhythmic tasks.
Conclusions:
- The developed controller effectively manages both rhythmic and non-rhythmic tasks in multi-joint prosthetic legs.
- This unified framework offers a pathway to more reliable and versatile prosthetic leg control for diverse real-world activities.
- The findings suggest potential for improved user mobility and reduced physical strain for amputees.
Related Concept Videos
PI Controller: Design
1.1K
Proportional Integral (PI) controllers are a fundamental component in modern control systems, widely used to enhance performance and mitigate steady-state errors. They are particularly effective in applications such as automatic brightness adjustment on smartphones, where they excel at mitigating steady-state errors for step-function inputs. Unlike PD controllers, which require time-varying errors to function optimally, PI controllers leverage their integral component to address residual...
1.1K
PD Controller: Design
568
In automotive engineering, car suspension systems often employ Proportional Derivative (PD) controllers to enhance performance. PD controllers are utilized to adjust the damping force in response to road conditions. A controller, acting as an amplifier with a constant gain, demonstrates proportional control, with output directly mirroring input.
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
568
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
342
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
342

