Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Characterizing DNA Repair Processes at Transient and Long-lasting Double-strand DNA Breaks by Immunofluorescence Microscopy
Published on: June 8, 2018
Necessities in the Processing of DNA Double Strand Breaks and Their Effects on Genomic Instability and Cancer
George Iliakis1, Emil Mladenov2, Veronika Mladenova3
1Institute of Medical Radiation Biology, University of Duisburg-Essen Medical School, 45122 Essen, Germany. georg.iliakis@uk-essen.de.
Abstract:
Double strand breaks (DSBs) are induced in the DNA following exposure of cells to ionizing radiation (IR) and are highly consequential for genome integrity, requiring highly specialized modes of processing. Erroneous processing of DSBs is a cause of cell death or its transformation to a cancer cell. Four mechanistically distinct pathways have evolved in cells of higher eukaryotes to process DSBs, providing thus multiple options for the damaged cells. The homologous recombination repair (HRR) dependent subway of gene conversion (GC) removes IR-induced DSBs from the genome in an error-free manner. Classical non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ) removes DSBs with very high speed but is unable to restore the sequence at the generated junction and can catalyze the formation of translocations. Alternative end-joining (alt-EJ) operates on similar principles as c-NHEJ but is slower and more error-prone regarding both sequence preservation and translocation formation. Finally, single strand annealing (SSA) is associated with large deletions and may also form translocations. Thus, the four pathways available for the processing of DSBs are not alternative options producing equivalent outcomes. We discuss the rationale for the evolution of pathways with such divergent properties and fidelities and outline the logic and necessities that govern their engagement. We reason that cells are not free to choose one specific pathway for the processing of a DSB but rather that they engage a pathway by applying the logic of highest fidelity selection, adapted to necessities imposed by the character of the DSB being processed. We introduce DSB clusters as a particularly consequential form of chromatin breakage and review findings suggesting that this form of damage underpins the increased efficacy of high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation modalities. The concepts developed have implications for the protection of humans from radon-induced cancer, as well as the treatment of cancer with radiations of high LET.
Insights
Cells utilize four distinct pathways to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by ionizing radiation (IR), prioritizing fidelity based on damage type. This DNA repair mechanism impacts cancer development and treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Radiation Biology
Background:
- DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are critical DNA lesions induced by ionizing radiation (IR).
- Improper repair of DSBs can lead to cell death or cancer. Higher eukaryotes possess four distinct DSB processing pathways.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the evolutionary rationale behind the divergent properties of DSB repair pathways.
- To elucidate the logic governing the engagement of specific DSB processing pathways.
- To discuss the implications of DSB processing for cancer and radiation therapy.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on DNA double-strand break repair pathways.
- Analysis of the fidelity and outcomes of homologous recombination repair (HRR), classical non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ), alternative end-joining (alt-EJ), and single-strand annealing (SSA).
- Discussion of the role of DSB clusters and high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation.
Main Results:
- The four DSB processing pathways (HRR, c-NHEJ, alt-EJ, SSA) exhibit distinct fidelities and outcomes, including error-free repair, sequence alteration, and translocation formation.
- Pathway engagement is governed by a "highest fidelity selection" logic, adapted to the specific characteristics of the DSB.
- DSB clusters, particularly relevant for high LET radiation, contribute to increased biological effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- Cells do not freely choose DSB repair pathways; pathway selection is dictated by damage characteristics and fidelity requirements.
- Understanding these pathways is crucial for mitigating risks associated with radiation exposure, such as radon-induced cancer.
- The findings have significant implications for optimizing cancer treatment strategies using high LET radiation modalities.
Related Concept Videos
Fixing Double-strand Breaks
Fixing Double-strand Breaks
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle
Overview of DNA Repair
Chemically...
Overview of DNA Repair

