Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Transmembrane Protein Family-Related Markers in Gastric Cancer and Implications for Targeted Therapies
Published on: September 15, 2023
Association of the selenoprotein 15-kDa (SEP15) polymorphisms with cancer risk: a meta-analysis
Noel Pabalan1, Phuntila Tharabenjasin1, Sitakan Natphopsuk1
1Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Abstract:
Selenoproteins are involved in antioxidant defense, the redox signaling pathway and cell homeostasis. Primary studies have shown that single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the selenoprotein gene (SEP15) are associated with cancer risk. However, conflicting outcomes warrant a meta-analysis to obtain more precise estimates. Literature search yielded 18 case-control studies from 12 articles. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of two SEP15 polymorphisms (rs5845 and rs5859) using standard genetic models (homozygous, recessive, dominant and codominant). Subgroup analysis was based on statistical power (80% cutoff) and cancer type (breast/respiratory/genitourinary/colorectal). Heterogeneity of the outcomes necessitated examining their sources (outlier treatment). Multiple comparison outcomes were corrected with the False Discovery Rate (PaF). Our core findings lay in the post-outlier recessive subgroup outcomes, where risks in the powered study (≥ 80%) was increased (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02-1.57, PaF = 0.047) while that in genitourinary cancer was protective (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.20-0.43, PaF < 10-4). The potency of outlier treatment in unmasking significant associations and generating homogeneity provides good evidence of SEP15's role in cancer. In the clinical sense, selenium chemo-intervention may be of benefit among persons with particular SEP15 genotypes.AbbreviationsAnumber of unduplicated articles that contributed to instabilityAManalysis modelBnumber of robust comparisonsBCbreast cancerBLCbladder cancercDNAcomplementary deoxyribonucleic acidCIconfidence intervalCIDconfidence interval differenceCRCcolorectal cancerDdecreased riskEHeliminated heterogeneityFfixed-effectsFDRFalse Discovery RateGUCgenitourinary cancersGSgained significanceHBhospital-basedHWEHardy-Weinberg EquilibriumIincreased riskI2measure of heterogeneitykDakiloDaltonLAClaryngeal cancerLUClung cancermafminor allele frequencynnumber of studiesNnumber of comparisonsNMnot mentionedNOSNewcastle-Ottawa ScaleORodds ratioPaP value for associationPaδP value for association (pre-FDR)PaFP value for association FDR-correctedPbP value for heterogeneityPBpopulation-basedPCprostate cancerPRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesPROpre-outlierPSOpost-outlierRrandom-effects[R]referenceRCrespiratory cancersRNSretained non-significanceROSreactive oxygen speciesSEPselenoproteinsSEP15selenoprotein geneSNPsingle nucleotide polymorphismSWShapiro-Wilk testUSAUnited States of Americavvvariantwvheterozygouswwwild-type.
More Related Videos
06:21Author Spotlight: Genetic Profiling for Fluorouracil Response in Gastric Cancer
Published on: May 10, 2024
08:15gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair
Published on: October 6, 2014