Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation01:24

DNA Isolation

44.3K
DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
44.3K
DNA Isolation01:34

DNA Isolation

198.8K
DNA from cells is required for many biotechnology and research applications, such as molecular cloning. To remove and purify DNA from cells, researchers use various methods of DNA extraction. While the specifics of different protocols may vary, some general concepts underlie the process of DNA extraction.
198.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microbial community succession of home aquarium biofilters associated with early establishment of comammox <i>Nitrospira</i>.

ISME communications·2025
Same author

Validating digital polymerase chain reaction for 16S rRNA gene amplification from low biomass environmental samples.

ISME communications·2025
Same author

Effect of temperature on microbial communities in bentonite for use in engineered barrier systems.

mSphere·2025
Same author

Interface-associated microbial growth in anoxic pressure vessels containing compacted gapfill bentonite.

Journal of applied microbiology·2025
Same author

Low water activity limits bentonite-associated microbial growth.

Journal of applied microbiology·2025
Same author

Comparative proteomics of biofilm development in <i>Pseudoalteromonas tunicata</i> discovers a distinct family of Ca<sup>2+</sup>-dependent adhesins.

mBio·2025
Same journal

Salinity-driven microbial adaptation of hydrocarbon-degrading communities in coastal sediments.

mSphere·2026
Same journal

Tools for genetic manipulation of the endemic fungal pathogen <i>Emergomyces africanus</i> and application of a fluorescent reporter strain in infection models.

mSphere·2026
Same journal

Cysteine-S-nitrosylation inhibits ROP5-mediated immune evasion in <i>Toxoplasma gondii</i>.

mSphere·2026
Same journal

Inheritance of four-membrane-bound structures in the "apicoplast-minus" <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i>.

mSphere·2026
Same journal

mSphere of Influence: The bacterial growth law-revisiting the old to discover the new.

mSphere·2026
Same journal

Preclinical characterization of immune responses induced by a candidate gonococcal native outer membrane vesicle vaccine.

mSphere·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Extraction of High Molecular Weight Genomic DNA from Soils and Sediments
11:24

Extraction of High Molecular Weight Genomic DNA from Soils and Sediments

Published on: November 10, 2009

26.3K

Validating DNA Extraction Protocols for Bentonite Clay.

Katja Engel1, Sara Coyotzi1, Melody A Vachon1

  • 1Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Msphere
|November 1, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Extracting microbial DNA from bentonite clay for radioactive waste storage is difficult. This study recommends a kit-based protocol without blocking agents for reliable DNA recovery from low-biomass samples.

Keywords:
DNA extractionWyoming MX-80bacteriabentonitecaseinclayphosphate

More Related Videos

Extraction of High Molecular Weight DNA from Microbial Mats
09:30

Extraction of High Molecular Weight DNA from Microbial Mats

Published on: July 7, 2011

20.0K
DNA Extraction from Paraffin Embedded Material for Genetic and Epigenetic Analyses
13:32

DNA Extraction from Paraffin Embedded Material for Genetic and Epigenetic Analyses

Published on: March 26, 2011

57.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Extraction of High Molecular Weight Genomic DNA from Soils and Sediments
11:24

Extraction of High Molecular Weight Genomic DNA from Soils and Sediments

Published on: November 10, 2009

26.3K
Extraction of High Molecular Weight DNA from Microbial Mats
09:30

Extraction of High Molecular Weight DNA from Microbial Mats

Published on: July 7, 2011

20.0K
DNA Extraction from Paraffin Embedded Material for Genetic and Epigenetic Analyses
13:32

DNA Extraction from Paraffin Embedded Material for Genetic and Epigenetic Analyses

Published on: March 26, 2011

57.2K

Area of Science:

  • Geomicrobiology
  • Environmental Science
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Bentonite clay is crucial for engineered barrier systems in deep geological repositories (DGRs) for high-level radioactive waste.
  • Microbial DNA extraction from bentonite is challenging due to low biomass and nucleic acid adsorption to the clay matrix.
  • Understanding microbial communities in DGRs is vital for assessing repository safety and performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate DNA extraction efficiency from MX-80 bentonite clay.
  • To assess the impact of blocking agents (casein, phosphate) on DNA recovery and microbial community profiling.
  • To identify an optimal DNA extraction protocol for low-biomass bentonite samples.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative PCR, gel fingerprinting, and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing were used.
  • DNA extraction protocols were tested on natural and spiked MX-80 bentonite.
  • Blocking agents (casein, phosphate) were evaluated for their efficacy and potential contamination.

Main Results:

  • Blocking agents improved DNA recovery at high spiking concentrations but introduced significant contamination at low concentrations.
  • Casein was not recommended due to insufficient removal of bacterial DNA contamination.
  • A kit-based extraction protocol without blocking agents yielded high DNA recovery with minimal contamination.

Conclusions:

  • A simplified, kit-based DNA extraction protocol is recommended for analyzing microbial communities in MX-80 bentonite.
  • This method ensures reliable nucleic acid recovery from low-biomass DGR materials.
  • The findings support the development of robust analytical frameworks for DGR environmental monitoring.