Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Apparent Weight01:09

Apparent Weight

9.6K
True weight is the measure of the gravitational force acting on an object. However, if the object accelerates, its measured weight is different from its true weight. Similar observations can be made when the object is submerged in water. An object's weight in water is its apparent weight, which is equal to the difference between its true weight and the buoyant forces.
Consider a person standing on a bathroom scale inside an elevator. If the scale is accurate at rest, its reading equals the...
9.6K
Variation in Acceleration due to Gravity near the Earth's Surface01:20

Variation in Acceleration due to Gravity near the Earth's Surface

2.7K
An object's apparent weight is its weight measured by a spring balance at its location. It is different from its true weight, the force with which the Earth pulls it, because of the Earth's rotation. Mathematically, an object's apparent weight equals its true weight minus the centripetal force that keeps it in a circular motion along with the Earth's surface every 24 hours.
The difference between the true and apparent weights is proportional to the square of the Earth's...
2.7K
Apparent Weight and the Earth's Rotation01:28

Apparent Weight and the Earth's Rotation

4.0K
Since all objects on the Earth's surface move through a circle every 24 hours, there must be a net centripetal force on each object, directed towards the center of that circle. The points of the north and south poles are the only exception to this rule.
For an object on the Earth's equator, the net centripetal force that accounts for its rotation is the Earth's pull towards its center, or the weight minus the normal force that prevents it from piercing into the Earth's surface....
4.0K
Mass and Weight01:19

Mass and Weight

14.8K
Mass and weight are often used interchangeably in everyday conversation. For example,  medical records often show our weight in kilograms, but never in the correct units of newtons. In physics, however, there is an important distinction. Weight is the pull of the Earth on an object. It depends on the distance from the center of the Earth. Weight dramatically varies if we leave the Earth's surface, unlike mass, which does not vary with location. On the Moon, for example, the...
14.8K
Weightlessness01:01

Weightlessness

6.6K
When an object is dropped, it accelerates toward the center of the Earth. If the net external force on the object is its weight, it is said to be in free fall; that is, the only force acting on the object is gravity. Galileo was instrumental in showing that, in the absence of air resistance, all objects fall with the same acceleration g. However, when objects on the Earth fall downward, they are never truly in free fall, because there is always some upward resistance force from the air acting...
6.6K
Deformation of Member under Multiple Loadings01:11

Deformation of Member under Multiple Loadings

412
When a rod is made of different materials or has various cross-sections, it must be divided into parts that meet the necessary conditions for determining the deformation. These parts are each characterized by their internal force, cross-sectional area, length, and modulus of elasticity. These parameters are then used to compute the deformation of the entire rod.
In the case of a member with a variable cross-section, the strain is not constant but depends on the position. The deformation of an...
412

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual information following object grasp supports digit position variability and swift anticipatory force control.

Journal of neurophysiology·2023
Same author

Transfer of weight information depends differently on used hand and handedness for perception and action.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Complementary contribution of the medial and lateral human parietal cortex to grasping: a repetitive TMS study.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2022
Same author

Neural effects of continuous theta-burst stimulation in macaque parietal neurons.

eLife·2022
Same author

Multisensory information about changing object properties can be used to quickly correct predictive force scaling for object lifting.

Experimental brain research·2022
Same author

The effects of TMS over the anterior intraparietal area on anticipatory fingertip force scaling and the size-weight illusion.

Journal of neurophysiology·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.2K

Dynamic size-weight changes after object lifting reduce the size-weight illusion.

Vonne van Polanen1, Marco Davare2,3

  • 1Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences and Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. vonne.vanpolanen@kuleuven.be.

Scientific Reports
|November 1, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The size-weight illusion, where smaller objects seem heavier, is significantly reduced when size and weight are perceived simultaneously. This finding supports theories suggesting a mismatch between expected and actual sensory feedback influences weight perception.

More Related Videos

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

14.3K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

28.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.2K
Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

14.3K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

28.4K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Perception science

Background:

  • The size-weight illusion demonstrates that perceived heaviness is influenced by object size.
  • Current theories suggest a mismatch between size-based expectations and sensory weight feedback causes this illusion.
  • Typically, object size is perceived before weight, potentially priming expectations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if simultaneous perception of size and weight changes affects the size-weight illusion.
  • To test the prediction mismatch theory by altering the timing of sensory information.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized virtual reality to manipulate object size and weight concurrently during lifting tasks.
  • Participants judged perceived weight changes under simultaneous size-weight alteration.
  • A control experiment used a standard sequential size-weight illusion protocol.

Main Results:

  • Simultaneous size-weight changes drastically reduced the size-weight illusion, with biases falling below discrimination thresholds.
  • A standard protocol with sequential size and weight perception yielded a typical, larger size-weight illusion.
  • Perceptual biases were significantly smaller when size and weight information were presented simultaneously.

Conclusions:

  • The size-weight illusion is diminished when size and weight information are perceived at the same time.
  • Findings support the prediction mismatch theory, highlighting the importance of simultaneous sensory feedback.
  • Comparing perceived and expected weight during lifting may be a key neural mechanism for the size-weight illusion.