Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

AIMS ratings--repeatability.

J A Bergen1, N B Carter, J Craig

  • 1Dept of Psychiatry, University of Sydney.

The British Journal of Psychiatry : the Journal of Mental Science
|May 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty who require early return to theatre have early increased mortality and worse functional outcomes at short term follow-up.

Injury·2023
Same author

Adaptive behaviour in children exposed to topiramate in the womb: An observational cohort study.

Seizure·2023
Same author

Scintillation light detection in the 6-m drift-length ProtoDUNE Dual Phase liquid argon TPC.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2022
Same author

The effects of COVID-19 on hip fracture management and mortality in a regional trauma centre.

Anaesthesia·2020
Same author

Impact of an influenza information pamphlet on vaccination uptake among Polish pupils in Edinburgh, Scotland and the role of social media in parental decision making.

BMC public health·2020
Same author

Preservation of erniettomorph fossils in clay-rich siliciclastic deposits from the Ediacaran Wood Canyon Formation, Nevada.

Interface focus·2020
Same journal

Effectiveness and safety of repeat dose subcutaneous ketamine for treatment-resistant depression, and the impact of prior ketamine treatment: open label extension of the KADS study.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2026
Same journal

Definitional invisibility: when institutional language reframes identity as choice.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2026
Same journal

Potential implications of removing evidence of impairment from the DSM-5 age-of-onset criterion in adult ADHD assessment.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2026
Same journal

The pressurised leaky funnel: rethinking recruitment, selection and retention in the UK psychiatry workforce.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2026
Same journal

Cutting through stigma: psychiatry and neurosurgery working together.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2026
Same journal

A fourth pillar for evidence-based medicine: implications for psychiatry - CORRIGENDUM.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2026
See all related articles

This study examined the reproducibility of the AIMS scale in rating patient examinations. While between-rater agreement was maintained, mean scores increased, indicating potential issues with AIMS rating consistency.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Nursing

Background:

  • The Assessment of Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) is crucial for monitoring psychotropic medication side effects.
  • Ensuring the reliability and reproducibility of AIMS ratings is essential for accurate patient assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the inter-rater reliability and intra-rater consistency of the AIMS scale.
  • To identify specific AIMS items that contribute to rating variability.
  • To assess the reproducibility of AIMS ratings in video-recorded patient examinations.

Main Methods:

  • Two raters (psychologist, nurse) independently rated 30 video-recorded patient examinations.
  • Ratings were conducted over a 6-week period, excluding patient fluctuation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on individual-rater consistency and between-rater agreement.

    • Main Results:

    • Between-rater agreement for the AIMS scale was generally maintained.
    • Mean AIMS scores demonstrated a steady increase over the study period.
    • AIMS items 2 and 4 showed high reliability, while items 1, 6, and 7 exhibited significant variability.
    • Certain patients were identified as more challenging to rate consistently.

    Conclusions:

    • While overall between-rater agreement was stable, the increasing mean AIMS scores suggest potential systematic bias or drift in rating.
    • Specific AIMS items (1, 6, 7) require further attention to improve rating consistency.
    • The study highlights the ongoing challenge of ensuring the reproducibility of AIMS ratings in clinical practice.