What Is the Evidence to Support a Correlate of Protection for Measles? A Systematic Review

Shelly Bolotin1,2,3, Stephanie L Hughes1, Nazish Gul1

  • 1Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Insights

The 120 mIU/mL measles antibody threshold lacks robust evidence. This systematic review found limited data supporting this common correlate of protection, indicating a need for further research.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Public Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Measles immunity is often assessed using a serologic correlate of protection.
  • A threshold of 120 mIU/mL is widely assumed to indicate protection against measles disease.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the scientific literature.
  • To examine the evidence supporting the 120 mIU/mL measles serologic correlate of protection.

Main Methods:

  • Searched peer-reviewed and gray literature for studies on measles correlates of protection.
  • Excluded studies on special populations, infants, animal models, or nonstandard vaccines.
  • Extracted and synthesized data from eligible full-text articles.

Main Results:

  • Included 5 studies from 14,778 screened articles.
  • Data varied due to different laboratory methods, hindering comparisons.
  • Some studies using the 120 mIU/mL threshold identified symptomatic individuals with higher antibody levels.

Conclusions:

  • The evidence supporting the 120 mIU/mL measles protection threshold is limited.
  • Further research is necessary to accurately define measles immunity thresholds.

Related Concept Videos

Vaccinations01:51

Vaccinations

Overview
51.0K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.2K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
1.7K
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment01:25

Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment

Transmission-based precautions are for patients infected or suspected to be infected (or colonized) with organisms posing a significant risk to others. The transmission precautions include airborne and protective environment precautions.
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
1.8K
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection01:26

Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection

The hosts' susceptibility to infection depends on several factors. The integrity of the skin and mucous membranes helps protect the body against microbial attacks. When the skin is altered, the chance of infection, limb loss, and even death increases.
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
13.2K
Antimicrobial Effectiveness01:28

Antimicrobial Effectiveness

The effectiveness of antimicrobial agents depends on various factors influencing their ability to eliminate microbial populations. Larger microbial populations require more time for complete eradication, emphasizing the importance of population size analysis when evaluating antimicrobial efficacy.Microbial resistance to antimicrobial agents varies significantly. Highly resilient microorganisms include endospores, gram-negative bacteria, and non-enveloped viruses, while prions are exceptionally...
864