Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea
Published on: November 25, 2016
Landscape context differentially drives diet breadth for two key pollinator species
Sarah Cusser1, John L Neff2, Shalene Jha3
1W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, 3700 East Gull Lake Dr, Hickory Corners, MI, 49060, USA. sarah.cusser@gmail.com.
Abstract:
An animal's diet contributes to its survival and reproduction. Variation in diet can alter the structure of community-level consumer-resource networks, with implications for ecological function. However, much remains unknown about the underlying drivers of diet breadth. Here we use a network approach to understand how consumer diet changes in response to local and landscape context and how these patterns compare between closely-related consumer species. We conducted field surveys to build 36 quantitative plant-pollinator networks using observation-based and pollen-based records of visitation across the gulf-coast cotton growing region of Texas, US. We focused on two key cotton pollinator species in the region: the social European honey bee, Apis mellifera, and the solitary native long-horned bee, Melissodes tepaneca. We demonstrate that diet breadth is highly context-dependent. Specifically, local factors better explain patterns of diet than regional factors for both species, but A. mellifera and M. tepaneca respond to local factors with contrasting patterns. Despite being collected directly from cotton blooms, both species exhibit significant preferences for non-cotton pollen, indicating a propensity to spend substantial effort foraging on remnant vegetation despite the rarity of these patches in the intensely managed cotton agroecosystem. Overall, our results demonstrate that diet is highly context- and species-dependent and thus an understanding of both factors is key for evaluating the conservation of important cotton pollinators.
Related Concept Videos
Pollination and Flower Structure
Ecological Niches
Optimal Foraging
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores
Types of Selection
Predator-Prey Interactions

