Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Long interpregnancy interval and mode of delivery
Uzma Ishaque1, Diane Korb2,3, Adèle Poincare2,4
1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Reims University Hospital, 45 Rue Cognacq Jay, Reims, France. uz.ishaque@gmail.com.
Women with a long interpregnancy interval (IPI) greater than 59 months have a higher risk of cesarean delivery compared to those with an ideal IPI of 18-24 months. However, long IPIs were associated with lower cesarean rates than nulliparity.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Reproductive Health
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Background:
- The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a minimum interpregnancy interval (IPI) of 24 months to reduce adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.
- Longer interpregnancy intervals, exceeding 59 months, have been suggested to potentially impact maternal and perinatal health, but their specific effects on labor and delivery, particularly cesarean delivery rates, remain less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cesarean delivery rate among primiparous women with a long interpregnancy interval (IPI) (>59 months) against primiparous women with an ideal minimum IPI (18-24 months) and nulliparous women.
- To investigate the influence of a long IPI on labor duration and cesarean delivery risk.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study was conducted over 17 years, including nulliparous and primiparous women delivering singleton, cephalic fetuses after 22 weeks of gestation.
- Women with IPIs <18 months or 24-59 months, and those with planned cesarean deliveries, were excluded. Three groups were analyzed: primiparous women with long IPI (>59 months), primiparous women with ideal IPI (18-24 months), and nulliparous women.
Main Results:
- The study included 18,503 women: 1342 in the long IPI group, 1388 in the ideal IPI group, and 15,773 in the nulliparous group.
- The cesarean delivery rate was significantly higher in the long IPI group (12.2%) compared to the ideal IPI group (6.3%) (aOR=2.2; 95% CI 1.6-3.1).
- Primiparous women with a long IPI had a lower cesarean rate (12.2%) than nulliparous women (14.3%) (aOR=0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.7), with nulliparous women experiencing longer labor durations.
Conclusions:
- Primiparous women with a long interpregnancy interval (>59 months) face an elevated risk of cesarean delivery during labor when compared to those with an ideal minimum IPI (18-24 months).
- Conversely, primiparous women with a long IPI demonstrated a reduced rate of cesarean delivery compared to nulliparous women. Labor durations were comparable between the long and ideal IPI groups.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility,...
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Birth Control Methods
In Vitro Fertilization
The IVF process begins with ovarian stimulation, during which reproductive endocrinologists prescribe hormonal medications to stimulate the ovaries to produce multiple eggs instead of the single...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational

