Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
AMSTAR 2 overall confidence rating: lacking discriminating capacity or requirement of high methodological quality?
Robert C Lorenz1, Katja Matthias2, Dawid Pieper3
1Federal Joint Committee (Healthcare), Medical Consultancy Department, Gutenbergstr. 13, Berlin 10587, Germany; Division of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Potsdam, Research Focus Cognitive Sciences, Am Neuen Palais 10, Potsdam 14469, Germany.
No abstract available in PubMed .
More Related Videos
09:07Author Spotlight: Accelerating Diagnostic Accuracy with Direct Identification of Gram-Negatives from Blood Culture Bottles
Published on: May 24, 2024
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Confidence Coefficient
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Reliability and Validity
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...