Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
Published on: September 17, 2019
Psychometric Modelling of Longitudinal Genetically Informative Twin Data
Inga Schwabe1,2, Zhengguo Gu1, Jesper Tijmstra1
1Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Longitudinal twin studies using sum-scores underestimate heritability. A latent state twin model integrating item response theory (IRT) offers a less biased approach for analyzing genetic and environmental influences over time.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Genetics
- Psychometrics
- Quantitative Genetics
Background:
- Longitudinal studies assess trait changes over time, enabling analysis of genetic and environmental influences on covariance.
- Traditional univariate A(C)E models can be extended longitudinally, but using sum-scores for self-report data may bias heritability estimates.
- Previous research indicates modeling raw item data is superior to sum-scores in univariate settings, but this hasn't been fully explored in longitudinal twin models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the bias introduced by using sum-scores in longitudinal A(C)E twin models.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a latent state twin A(C)E model, incorporating item response theory (IRT), in overcoming sum-score bias.
- To compare the performance of sum-score and IRT-based approaches in longitudinal genetic analyses.
Main Methods:
- Developed a latent state twin A(C)E model combining genetic twin modeling with item response theory (IRT) within a Bayesian framework.
- Conducted two simulation studies to assess bias in heritability and covariance estimates under sum-score and IRT approaches.
- Analyzed empirical data from a two-wave twin study (N=8,016) on social attitudes to illustrate model differences.
Main Results:
- Sum-score approaches in longitudinal A(C)E models led to underestimated heritability and biased covariance estimates.
- The IRT-based latent state twin model also exhibited bias, but to a significantly lesser degree than the sum-score approach.
- Bias increased in both frameworks in the second simulation (ACE model), with the IRT approach consistently showing less bias.
Conclusions:
- Using sum-scores in longitudinal twin studies can lead to biased genetic and environmental parameter estimates.
- The latent state twin A(C)E model integrating IRT is a less biased alternative for analyzing longitudinal phenotypic data.
- Researchers are advised to adopt the IRT approach for more accurate estimation of genetic and environmental influences in longitudinal twin studies.
Related Concept Videos
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Longitudinal Studies
Heritability
Longitudinal Research
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...

