Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

637
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
637
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

4.0K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
4.0K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

4.4K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fuels Mediate the Influence of Climate Teleconnections on Wildfires in Dryland Ecosystems.

Global change biology·2025
Same author

Joint optimization of land carbon uptake and albedo can help achieve moderate instantaneous and long-term cooling effects.

Communications earth & environment·2024
Same author

Temperature-Corrected Calibration of GS3 and TEROS-12 Soil Water Content Sensors.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Wildfire precursors show complementary predictability in different timescales.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

Publisher Correction: Leveraging research infrastructure co-location to evaluate constraints on terrestrial carbon cycling in northern European forests.

Ambio·2023
Same author

Multi-year belowground data of minirhizotron facilities in Selhausen.

Scientific data·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 4, 2026

MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T
10:22

MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T

Published on: January 16, 2021

5.8K

Calibration, Conversion, and Quantitative Multi-Layer Inversion of Multi-Coil Rigid-Boom Electromagnetic Induction

Christian von Hebel1,2, Jan van der Kruk3,4, Johan A Huisman5,6

  • 1Institute of Bio- and Geoscience, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany. c.von.hebel@fz-juelich.de.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 6, 2019
PubMed
Summary

This study enhances electromagnetic induction (EMI) data processing for accurate subsurface electrical conductivity mapping. Improved calibration and conversion methods yield reliable conductivity models, aiding environmental monitoring and remote sensing integration.

Keywords:
EMI data calibrationaccurate magnetic field data conversionelectromagnetic induction (EMI)quantitative layered electrical conductivity inversiontoward linking depth-specific large-scale quasi-3D inversion results with geo-observational data

More Related Videos

Optimized Setup and Protocol for Magnetic Domain Imaging with In Situ Hysteresis Measurement
09:43

Optimized Setup and Protocol for Magnetic Domain Imaging with In Situ Hysteresis Measurement

Published on: November 7, 2017

9.8K
Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors
06:17

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors

Published on: January 16, 2020

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 4, 2026

MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T
10:22

MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T

Published on: January 16, 2021

5.8K
Optimized Setup and Protocol for Magnetic Domain Imaging with In Situ Hysteresis Measurement
09:43

Optimized Setup and Protocol for Magnetic Domain Imaging with In Situ Hysteresis Measurement

Published on: November 7, 2017

9.8K
Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors
06:17

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors

Published on: January 16, 2020

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Geophysics
  • Environmental Science
  • Electrical Engineering

Background:

  • Multi-coil electromagnetic induction (EMI) systems measure subsurface apparent electrical conductivity (σa).
  • Traditional EMI data processing can be unreliable due to above-ground influences and signal alterations.
  • Accurate electrical conductivity models are crucial for subsurface characterization and monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an improved data processing workflow for multi-coil EMI data.
  • To enhance the calibration, conversion, and inversion of EMI measurements for greater accuracy.
  • To improve the reliability of subsurface electrical conductivity models derived from EMI data.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of three direct current resistivity techniques (Dipole-Dipole, Schlumberger, vertical electrical soundings) for EMI data calibration.
  • Implementation of a non-linear exact EMI conversion method for magnetic field to σa conversion.
  • Development of a complete processing workflow integrating calibration, conversion, and inversion.

Main Results:

  • All three direct current resistivity methods provided robust calibration results for σa.
  • Dipole-Dipole-based calibration demonstrated stability across different soil types.
  • The proposed workflow yields accurate, quantitative EMI data and reliable intrinsic electrical conductivity estimates.

Conclusions:

  • The enhanced EMI data processing workflow significantly improves the accuracy and reliability of subsurface electrical conductivity models.
  • This advancement facilitates better integration of EMI data with other geophysical methods like remote sensing.
  • The improved methodology supports more effective subsurface monitoring applications.