Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Mosaic Zebrafish Transgenesis for Functional Genomic Analysis of Candidate Cooperative Genes in Tumor Pathogenesis
Published on: March 31, 2015
Impact of MYCN status on response of high-risk neuroblastoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
David Yanishevski1, M Beth McCarville2, Mikhail Doubrovin2
1Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.
Background/Purpose:
MYCN-amplification in neuroblastoma is associated with an aggressive clinical phenotype. We evaluated the association of MYCN amplification with tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Methods:
Primary tumor response, assessed by percentage volume change on CT scan and degree of tumor resection, assessed by the operating surgeon, were retrospectively compared in 84 high-risk neuroblastoma patients. There were thirty-four (40%) with MYCN-amplified tumors and fifty (60%) with non-amplified tumors treated at our institution from 1999 to 2016. Metastatic disease response was assessed on MIBG scan by change in Curie score.
Results:
MYCN-amplification was associated with a greater mean percentage reduction in primary tumor volume after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (72.27% versus 46.83% [non-amplified tumors], p = 0.001). The percentage of patients with a Curie score > 2 at diagnosis who then had a score ≤ 2 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not significantly different (8 [61.5%] and 8 [34.8%], respectively, p = 0.37). Twenty-eight (85.7%) patients with MYCN-amplification had ≥90% surgical resection compared to 45 (91.84%) patients with non-amplified tumors (p = 0.303).
Conclusions:
MYCN-amplification in high-risk neuroblastoma was associated with a better response of the primary tumor to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but not metastatic sites, than in patients with non-amplified tumors. This did not significantly impact the ability to resect ≥90% of the primary tumor/locoregional disease.
Type Of Study:
Treatment Study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

