Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Induced-fit Model01:13

Induced-fit Model

88.2K
Most chemical reactions in cells require enzymes—biological catalysts that speed up the reaction without being consumed or permanently changed. They reduce the activation energy needed to convert the reactants into products. Enzymes are proteins, that usually work by binding to a substrate—a reactant molecule that they act upon.
Enzymes exhibit substrate specificity, meaning that they can only bind to certain substrates. This is mainly determined by the shape and chemical...
88.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mechanism-Informed Rules Tunably Balance Novelty and Feasibility of Predicted Enzymatic Reactions.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Mechanism-informed rules tunably balance novelty and feasibility of predicted enzymatic reactions.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

TridentSynth: a webtool for the retrosynthesis of molecules using chimeric type I polyketide synthases and chemoenzymatic pathways.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

Development of Reaction-Centered Encoders and Benchmarking of Enzyme-Reaction Pair Models.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Client distribution between Chlamydomonas FDX1 and FDX2 in carbon, nitrogen and sulfur assimilation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Utilizing Waste Nitrogen to Develop Microbial Protein from Cyanophycin Accumulating Organisms.

ACS ES&T water·2025
Same journal

Role of Aspergillus neutral protease II in heat-induced soy sauce sediment formation.

Applied microbiology and biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Cysteine-S-conjugate β-lyase: a green catalyst for the production of flavor-active mercaptoketones.

Applied microbiology and biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Perfusion development and its potential for cell therapy manufacturing with adherent cells.

Applied microbiology and biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Bacterial degradation of aromatic ester pollutants in agro-ecosystems: implications for bioremediation.

Applied microbiology and biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Inhibiting biofilm growth on ammonium salt-functionalized or fluorinated voice prostheses silicone.

Applied microbiology and biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Enhancing reproducibility in mixing time determination of stirred tank reactors via automated analysis and standardized inter-laboratory trials.

Applied microbiology and biotechnology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening
10:50

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Published on: April 1, 2016

11.4K

Model-guided mechanism discovery and parameter selection for directed evolution.

Sarah C Stainbrook1, Keith E J Tyo2,3

  • 1Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences Program, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
|November 6, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Directed evolution uses statistical modeling to optimize selection strategies for genetic variants. This framework predicts population changes under selective pressures, improving experimental design for identifying beneficial traits.

Keywords:
Computational modelingCounterselectionDirected evolutionFluorescence-activated cell sorting

More Related Videos

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli
09:01

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Published on: March 16, 2011

31.0K
A New Screening Method for the Directed Evolution of Thermostable Bacteriolytic Enzymes
13:30

A New Screening Method for the Directed Evolution of Thermostable Bacteriolytic Enzymes

Published on: November 7, 2012

18.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening
10:50

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Published on: April 1, 2016

11.4K
Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli
09:01

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Published on: March 16, 2011

31.0K
A New Screening Method for the Directed Evolution of Thermostable Bacteriolytic Enzymes
13:30

A New Screening Method for the Directed Evolution of Thermostable Bacteriolytic Enzymes

Published on: November 7, 2012

18.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Synthetic Biology
  • Molecular Evolution

Background:

  • Directed evolution enhances genetic variants for specific properties, often using alternating selection criteria.
  • The impact of selection sequence and stringency on multi-trait evolution remains poorly understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a statistical modeling framework for analyzing selection effects in directed evolution.
  • To systematically evaluate the influence of selective pressure parameters on library evolution.
  • To identify and mitigate artifacts arising from undesirable selective pressures during screening.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized single-cell fluorescence intensity distributions to model phenotypic population dynamics.
  • Developed a predictive model for population proportion changes under positive and counterselection.
  • Validated the model with metabolite-responsive transcription factors and yeast G-protein-coupled receptors.

Main Results:

  • The model accurately predicts population shifts based on defined selective pressures.
  • Identified previously unrecognized biological sources of undesirable selective pressure during sorting.
  • Demonstrated that unaddressed artifacts can lead to screening failures.

Conclusions:

  • The statistical modeling framework provides a quantitative approach for optimizing FACS-based directed evolution.
  • This method guides the selection of experimental parameters to enhance the enrichment of true positive genetic variants.
  • Improved experimental design increases the success rate of directed evolution efforts.